<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/twitter_security_hypocrisy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:27:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-15343402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This can  affect the popularity of the twitters. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joomlaexpert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:27:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-15236669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is slightly worrying the number of sites that you can feed into twitter using your twitter account details. If one of those was to experience a problem, then all your data could be at risk very quickly!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Acai Berry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:08:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-14971791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ frankcrccd   If you have a website and your on twitter it does get you more traffic but you have to work at it etc. @ spanishinspain   Twitter is there it just depends how you use it, I wouldn't say it played a major role. I would certainly avoid viral on twitter. For anyone on Twitter don't twit me MLM grrr&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">celebtwitr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:54:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-13996311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never use the "invite your friends" features. I can just as easily send a mass email myself without worrying about anyone else swipping my passwords.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">InsideSpurdy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:10:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-13366371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yet does anyone really know the longterm damage that can be done by sharing so much about ourselves on something as permanent as the internet?  Will the 2040 presidential nominees have twitter history from this year haunting them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Valley School Teacher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:43:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-13365847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People seem to get lost in the app excitement and get sloppy about security.  So happy to share personal where abouts, etc that they forget a certain discretion is still necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cali Detective</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:18:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-13358324</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course Twitter needs to be more cautious than before. Even otherwise, I am quite wary of entering my passwords to  Viral Tell A Friend kind of applications.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mktgpro</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:09:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12935057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a bit suspicious about Techcrunch publishing such an important information... Could it be in Twitter's interest?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Green Times</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:25:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12920400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently heard that most of the Twitter private documents were hacked by Hackers by using Google and brought to notice of Common man! Is this what we call Security? Twitter needs to grow up...But anyways, I love twitter!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">techfreakstuff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12862618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The big issue here is that  hackers  get access through a google apps account.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rotem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:49:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12815919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is just a snippet from the PC World article which specifically doesn't mention any Twitter accounts being accessed, other than Twitter employees who had their Gmail compromised.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/168462/twitter_hacked_secrets_to_be_revealed.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.pcworld.com/article/168462/twitter_hacked_secrets_to_be_revealed.html"&gt;http://www.pcworld.com/arti...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only place you will find claims to people outside twitter being compromised (this time around) are are sensationalist headlines which are scraped together from other sources.&lt;br&gt;Thing might appear in searches just due to keyword use, not because it actually happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12810049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some commentators say that user accounts were compromised:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shelly-palmer/twitter-hacked-through-go_b_235271.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shelly-palmer/twitter-hacked-through-go_b_235271.html"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Others accept Twitter's official line which is that the hacker only produced evidence of one account being hacked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Either way, the hacker did apparently have had access to Twitter user accounts to some extent, and took a screenshot of at least one. Twitter's blog claimed that only that one user account was compromised.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Acheson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12806309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lately I've also been thinking about all of the various apps requesting access to your Twitter account in order to function. Sure they use the api, but what's stopping some of these sites from being malicious with the user/pass information? Not much, far as I can tell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good point regarding the Viral TAF systems as well. A compromised Email addy is bad news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tampapestcontrol</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12760239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know that before, i'd rather not give away my passwords on the web.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lisalyne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:30:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12757763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I doubt that very much - Twitter doesn't need Techcrunch for anything now&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:33:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12757504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you have your facts wrong on what data was actually seen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They didn't get access to celebrity accounts on this, but personal details such as direct email addresses possibly to agents etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12741765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now Twitter's own internal systems have been hacked, along with the accounts of Twitter users including celebrities:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jul/twitter_hacked_via_google_apps" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.timacheson.com/Blog/2009/jul/twitter_hacked_via_google_apps"&gt;http://www.timacheson.com/B...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The initial point of entry wasn't a gap in Twitter's security. The hacker(s) gained access through a Google Apps account. The worry with a Google account is, it's web-based and therefore only as secure as the rest of the Internet. If yuor Google account is compromised and you use Google Docs in a serious commercial setting, your Twitter account will be the least of your worries.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Acheson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:10:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Security Hypocrisy</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/2059/twitter-security-hypocrisy.html#comment-12734703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm thinking whether twitters popularity will be hit by techcrunch or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:04:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>