-
Website
http://andybeard.eu/ -
Original page
http://andybeard.eu/803/linking-payola.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
authorityseo
4 comments · 18 points
-
Jonathan Dingman
4 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
2656 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
4 comments · 1 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I suppose some of these could be said for leaving comment as well. I'd rather link to someone because the content was relevant to a point I am trying to make.
I will definitely keep these in mind next time I link to someone from my site(s).
Even if you make a concious effort to link to some different people, I am sure a large number of the people you choose to link to might be in some way "payback" because you have noticed them linking to you in the past.
Many of these characteristics are a positive thing for whatever your point of view is, because it can inherently grow critical mass to a certain way of thinking.
As an example it is very rare for me to link out to blogs which aren't using some kind of dofollow because a lot of my feed reading time is now spent in the dofollow community I created.
I suppose some of these could be said for leaving comment as well. I'd rather link to someone because the content was relevant to a point I am trying to make.
I will definitely keep these in mind next time I link to someone from my site(s).
Even if you make a concious effort to link to some different people, I am sure a large number of the people you choose to link to might be in some way "payback" because you have noticed them linking to you in the past.
Many of these characteristics are a positive thing for whatever your point of view is, because it can inherently grow critical mass to a certain way of thinking.
As an example it is very rare for me to link out to blogs which aren't using some kind of dofollow because a lot of my feed reading time is now spent in the dofollow community I created.
Without that angle on the reason to link out, it wouldn't class as payola, so wouldn't be on the list. :)
There is also the additional factor that most people linking out would link out to someone already in their feed reader rather than searching Technorati or Google Blogsearch for a definitive review.
It is quite possible the reason someone ends up in your feed reader in the first place is because of one of the items listed above.
There is nothing ethically wrong with most of the things I have listed above, other than perhaps a total denial that this kind of linking happens.
Without that angle on the reason to link out, it wouldn't class as payola, so wouldn't be on the list. :)
There is also the additional factor that most people linking out would link out to someone already in their feed reader rather than searching Technorati or Google Blogsearch for a definitive review.
It is quite possible the reason someone ends up in your feed reader in the first place is because of one of the items listed above.
There is nothing ethically wrong with most of the things I have listed above, other than perhaps a total denial that this kind of linking happens.
Honestly, I don't know how you could link to someone and not fall into one of those categories, even by accident. I probably fall under number 14 a lot, but I don't think it has anything to do with demonstrating authority.
I think it is frankly impossible to disclose every motivation when linking through to someone and many motivations are subconscious.
Honestly, I don't know how you could link to someone and not fall into one of those categories, even by accident. I probably fall under number 14 a lot, but I don't think it has anything to do with demonstrating authority.
I think it is frankly impossible to disclose every motivation when linking through to someone and many motivations are subconscious.
It's your mom? (:op
It is a great way to introduce yourself sometimes but I think you have compiled some of the underlying motivation of some bloggers.
Steve
19. actually started off as something like that and I twisted it slightly further because of one link I saw yesterday.
I personally gain a great deal of satisfaction sending people lots of traffic and bringing them into the limelight.
At the same time you hear people (top bloggers) questioning why they didn't receive a "via" link, and because you empathise with the point of view, you could possibly have a subconscious or concious motivation in bringing the content to the attention of your readers.
Damn I owe my mum so much, if she ever stated blogging she would get link dropped at every possible occasion.
I suppose if someone is blogging purely for themselves, with the blog blocked such that it can't be indexed by the search engines, no comments or trackbacks allowed, and no way to subscribe, a total black box, maybe even just on a desktop installed copy, then none of the above will creep in.
Whilst the list seems comprehensive, I did actually leave a few out.
It's your mom? (:op
It is a great way to introduce yourself sometimes but I think you have compiled some of the underlying motivation of some bloggers.
Steve
19. actually started off as something like that and I twisted it slightly further because of one link I saw yesterday.
I personally gain a great deal of satisfaction sending people lots of traffic and bringing them into the limelight.
At the same time you hear people (top bloggers) questioning why they didn't receive a "via" link, and because you empathise with the point of view, you could possibly have a subconscious or concious motivation in bringing the content to the attention of your readers.
Damn I owe my mum so much, if she ever stated blogging she would get link dropped at every possible occasion.
I suppose if someone is blogging purely for themselves, with the blog blocked such that it can't be indexed by the search engines, no comments or trackbacks allowed, and no way to subscribe, a total black box, maybe even just on a desktop installed copy, then none of the above will creep in.
Whilst the list seems comprehensive, I did actually leave a few out.
Stephen's first point is a good one, too.
You demonstrate your expertise extremely well through your blog, and that would be much harder to achieve if you didn't reference technical documents.
If you have readers you are trying to
<ul>
<li>Satisfy them</li>
<li>Educate them</li>
<li>Convert them into customers</li>
<li>Hope they might link to you</li>
<li>Help them see your point of view</li>
</ul>
Linking out is a good thing to do, it is one of the hallmarks of good blogging and my favorite blogs are typically those that link out to others views frequently.
I have said I have linked to people for many of these reasons, in all honesty it is approaching half, but certainly more than 10 on the list.
That being said, it would be very hard to categorise altruistic anonymous editors on Wikipedia as linking as some form of payola, although many of those also create pages to improve their own standing within the Wikipedia community.
I agree sometimes links are just references, but here is an example.
Everyone was recently just writing about Mahalo. I wrote about it a couple of days later than many, a day later than most. I got to the end of the post and was just about to hit the publish button, and I consciously thought to myself, "oh I suppose as I like the service I should really give it a link" - I am sure most of my readers didn't need it, plus I think I had a reference earlier in the article as well.
Stephen's first point is a good one, too.
You demonstrate your expertise extremely well through your blog, and that would be much harder to achieve if you didn't reference technical documents.
If you have readers you are trying to
<ul>
<li>Satisfy them</li>
<li>Educate them</li>
<li>Convert them into customers</li>
<li>Hope they might link to you</li>
<li>Help them see your point of view</li>
</ul>
Linking out is a good thing to do, it is one of the hallmarks of good blogging and my favorite blogs are typically those that link out to others views frequently.
I have said I have linked to people for many of these reasons, in all honesty it is approaching half, but certainly more than 10 on the list.
That being said, it would be very hard to categorise altruistic anonymous editors on Wikipedia as linking as some form of payola, although many of those also create pages to improve their own standing within the Wikipedia community.
I agree sometimes links are just references, but here is an example.
Everyone was recently just writing about Mahalo. I wrote about it a couple of days later than many, a day later than most. I got to the end of the post and was just about to hit the publish button, and I consciously thought to myself, "oh I suppose as I like the service I should really give it a link" - I am sure most of my readers didn't need it, plus I think I had a reference earlier in the article as well.
I enjoyed every word
I enjoyed every word
Mostly I link to tel people what I am talking about (I link to myself a lot) but sometimes I also link just to let people know what I am reading (like this).
Mostly I link to tel people what I am talking about (I link to myself a lot) but sometimes I also link just to let people know what I am reading (like this).
@Andy - I am still at the point where I am hoping folks will just leave comments or BUMP my articles... at this point if somebody leaves a comment, I usually try to find a way to mention them in an article or something... so, I can really relate with the reasons outlined in this article.
@Andy - I am still at the point where I am hoping folks will just leave comments or BUMP my articles... at this point if somebody leaves a comment, I usually try to find a way to mention them in an article or something... so, I can really relate with the reasons outlined in this article.
This is a great post. Most of the links you describe are happening every day, used by people that turn their noses up at "creative" or "manipulative" linking, yet they are largely uninclined to turn the loop onto themselves.
I know you're a big fan of complete disclosure. I for one think it has to stop somewhere. On the otherhand, the hypocrisy of some really gets to me.
Sorry for rambling. Bumped.
This is a great post. Most of the links you describe are happening every day, used by people that turn their noses up at "creative" or "manipulative" linking, yet they are largely uninclined to turn the loop onto themselves.
I know you're a big fan of complete disclosure. I for one think it has to stop somewhere. On the otherhand, the hypocrisy of some really gets to me.
Sorry for rambling. Bumped.
Sometimes it's difficult to find content or anything link worthy outside of your small circle of friends because that small circle of friends is all we know.
Maybe it's time to do a "spread the link love" game where we all link to some new blog that we've never heard of before...just because. :)
~ Teli
Sometimes it's difficult to find content or anything link worthy outside of your small circle of friends because that small circle of friends is all we know.
Maybe it's time to do a "spread the link love" game where we all link to some new blog that we've never heard of before...just because. :)
~ Teli
However some of the other points definitely pricked my conscience and you've made me think about how I link out in the future.
However some of the other points definitely pricked my conscience and you've made me think about how I link out in the future.