<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Portal Feeder vs StomperNet</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/portal_feeder_vs_stompernet_55/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:38:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Portal Feeder vs StomperNet</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/698/portal-feeder-vs-stompernet.html#comment-12523890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;br&gt;I know this is an older post, but I was surfing around trying to dig up some info on how Google felt about membership groups like StomperNet and PortalFeeder and my search led me here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bottom line to these programs is helping build links to member sites (I know the offer other good stuff too).  I love the concept, but something tells me Google frowns on this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be easy for Google to join, discover the members and then penalize them.  Any thoughts on why they don't (seem to)?  Is that they don't feel this is spammy -- more cooperative?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Arnie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie Kuenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Portal Feeder vs StomperNet</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/698/portal-feeder-vs-stompernet.html#comment-10989305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;br&gt;I know this is an older post, but I was surfing around trying to dig up some info on how Google felt about membership groups like StomperNet and PortalFeeder and my search led me here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bottom line to these programs is helping build links to member sites (I know the offer other good stuff too).  I love the concept, but something tells me Google frowns on this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be easy for Google to join, discover the members and then penalize them.  Any thoughts on why they don't (seem to)?  Is that they don't feel this is spammy -- more cooperative?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Arnie&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arnie Kuenn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>