<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/linking_to_differing_opinion_69/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:40:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Giving different opinions to me seems obvious. Obviously, not everyone wants to hear just your opinion.  Take Bill O'reilly for example...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Giving different opinions to me seems obvious. Obviously, not everyone wants to hear just your opinion.  Take Bill O'reilly for example...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy:  That's really helpful.  I appreciate how you recognize bloggers who comment here and link your way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damien Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:39:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy:  That's really helpful.  I appreciate how you recognize bloggers who comment here and link your way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damien Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:39:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ho Ho nicely put.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hobo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ho Ho nicely put.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hobo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damien Techcrunch is a very fast paced blog, receiving a lot of links from people with varied opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am sure at times Techcrunch can receive upwards of 200 links for a post, though a fair percentage would be from splogs either scraping Techcrunch, or the people linking to Techcrunch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would never expect Michael to link through in updates to everyone who linked to him who had something to say, but it is good practice to have pingbacks/trackbacks displayed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mine appear after the comments box, and I have seen 50+ clicks in my stats through to such links on popular posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damien Techcrunch is a very fast paced blog, receiving a lot of links from people with varied opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am sure at times Techcrunch can receive upwards of 200 links for a post, though a fair percentage would be from splogs either scraping Techcrunch, or the people linking to Techcrunch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would never expect Michael to link through in updates to everyone who linked to him who had something to say, but it is good practice to have pingbacks/trackbacks displayed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mine appear after the comments box, and I have seen 50+ clicks in my stats through to such links on popular posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michael, maybe I should place that statement in a &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/payperpost-wasting-investor-money-while-offending-native-americans/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/payperpost-wasting-investor-money-while-offending-native-americans/"&gt;historical context&lt;/a&gt;, with quotes such as:-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;The company complains that we write about them only because it drives controversy and traffic. That is, of course, absolutely correct. I freely admit it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately you deleted that from the original post, but it is still available online from people &lt;a href="http://www.ajaxgirl.com/2007/09/23/payperpost-abuses-declining-job-candidate/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ajaxgirl.com/2007/09/23/payperpost-abuses-declining-job-candidate/"&gt;who syndicate your content&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Damn splogs are useful sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That wasn't even a unique occurrence, I can recall similar comments in the past, but I would have to invest some time digging them out, and there is always the chance they are no longer present.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is &lt;b&gt;nothing wrong&lt;/b&gt;with being controversial, or having a very firm opinion, but the more one sided your opinion is, the more you should try to at least ensure trackbacks make it through for some balance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the rest of the article, I think I gave you a lot of slack, as the lack of trackbacks appearing these days could well be a major fault of Akismet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can remember times during heated blogging debate where there were 40+ trackbacks appearing on Techcrunch posts. Those days are gone - I don't know the reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, a good deal of those trackbacks were from the likes of the useful resource I just dug up, but what of the remainder?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michael, maybe I should place that statement in a &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/payperpost-wasting-investor-money-while-offending-native-americans/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/payperpost-wasting-investor-money-while-offending-native-americans/"&gt;historical context&lt;/a&gt;, with quotes such as:-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;The company complains that we write about them only because it drives controversy and traffic. That is, of course, absolutely correct. I freely admit it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately you deleted that from the original post, but it is still available online from people &lt;a href="http://www.ajaxgirl.com/2007/09/23/payperpost-abuses-declining-job-candidate/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ajaxgirl.com/2007/09/23/payperpost-abuses-declining-job-candidate/"&gt;who syndicate your content&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Damn splogs are useful sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That wasn't even a unique occurrence, I can recall similar comments in the past, but I would have to invest some time digging them out, and there is always the chance they are no longer present.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is &lt;b&gt;nothing wrong&lt;/b&gt;with being controversial, or having a very firm opinion, but the more one sided your opinion is, the more you should try to at least ensure trackbacks make it through for some balance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the rest of the article, I think I gave you a lot of slack, as the lack of trackbacks appearing these days could well be a major fault of Akismet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can remember times during heated blogging debate where there were 40+ trackbacks appearing on Techcrunch posts. Those days are gone - I don't know the reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sure, a good deal of those trackbacks were from the likes of the useful resource I just dug up, but what of the remainder?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, great article as always.  I am wondering what you mean by "safety net" however.  I have my idea what you mean but it's not crystal clear.  To me trackbacks show that you value your sources and you can back up what you say.  Am I on the right track?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damien Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, great article as always.  I am wondering what you mean by "safety net" however.  I have my idea what you mean but it's not crystal clear.  To me trackbacks show that you value your sources and you can back up what you say.  Am I on the right track?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damien Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, a clarification. you quote one of my comments where i talk about hits, and translate that into a sort of admission by me that controversy sells. that isn't accurate. "hits" is a popular story - which is based on an interesteing story. that's generally a new startup, or an acquisition. or possibly an opinion piece. but it doesn't mean "hit job" or "something, anything, controversial." I'm talking about a hit, like a hit song.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael arrington</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, a clarification. you quote one of my comments where i talk about hits, and translate that into a sort of admission by me that controversy sells. that isn't accurate. "hits" is a popular story - which is based on an interesteing story. that's generally a new startup, or an acquisition. or possibly an opinion piece. but it doesn't mean "hit job" or "something, anything, controversial." I'm talking about a hit, like a hit song.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michael arrington</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-12527747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great idea Andy.  And I can see how linking to a different opinion could be beneficial, so long as the other blogger didn't take it too personally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A while ago I blogged about bloggers stealing work from their employers and one guy got really annoyed with me and decided to blog about it.  The trouble was, he didn't link to me properly - the link just said "this blog", which didn't come across as professional at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was like my opinion had annoyed him so much that he couldn't even bear to type my name.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cathlawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:54:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linking To Differing Opinion</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1228/linking-to-differing-opinion.html#comment-10993343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great idea Andy.  And I can see how linking to a different opinion could be beneficial, so long as the other blogger didn't take it too personally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A while ago I blogged about bloggers stealing work from their employers and one guy got really annoyed with me and decided to blog about it.  The trouble was, he didn't link to me properly - the link just said "this blog", which didn't come across as professional at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was like my opinion had annoyed him so much that he couldn't even bear to type my name.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cathlawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:54:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>