<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/is_payperpost_the_only_subject_nick_denton_and_jason_calacanis_agree_on_04/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:16:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@kukumon- what are you talking about? I am not getting it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@kukumon- what are you talking about? I am not getting it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Pay Per Post is a good idea only if you get the percentage ratios correct!&lt;br&gt;If you have 10 post and then only 50% of monitor screen for content, then you can only have a small percentage for pay per post!&lt;br&gt;Who wanna watch a freakin program if the program is just 20 minute long and the advertisement is 40 minute?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kukuman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Pay Per Post is a good idea only if you get the percentage ratios correct!&lt;br&gt;If you have 10 post and then only 50% of monitor screen for content, then you can only have a small percentage for pay per post!&lt;br&gt;Who wanna watch a freakin program if the program is just 20 minute long and the advertisement is 40 minute?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kukuman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@VC Dan&lt;br&gt;I hope what you are saying is true. It is indeed veryclever sign up process. But I am wondering how many new sign ups may think "oh well, even if I don't get to review the big $ deals I can always come back and review posts like this one fro $5 per post"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@VC Dan&lt;br&gt;I hope what you are saying is true. It is indeed veryclever sign up process. But I am wondering how many new sign ups may think "oh well, even if I don't get to review the big $ deals I can always come back and review posts like this one fro $5 per post"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been a Postie for some time now, but I only take opportunities that meld well with one of my blogs. I believe that as long as I'm being honest in my review/post, then there's value both for the advertiser and for my readers. That might mean not posting on certain days (even though PayPerPost allows up to 3 posts a day per blog), but if it's of no longer term value to me I prefer to avoid it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take a look at this post: &lt;a href="http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/03/03/freebies-in-exchange-for-advertising/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/03/03/freebies-in-exchange-for-advertising/"&gt;http://www.u-g-h.com/index....&lt;/a&gt;  It's a review of another website's promotion. I was paid for the post, but it was a fair and unbiased view of what I think about it. It's more material for my blog and I reckon the advertiser got some mileage out of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suppose I'm lucky in a way, blogging is just a hobby for me, so I can afford to be picky. Not sure what others who depend on blogging revenue would have to say about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Owen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been a Postie for some time now, but I only take opportunities that meld well with one of my blogs. I believe that as long as I'm being honest in my review/post, then there's value both for the advertiser and for my readers. That might mean not posting on certain days (even though PayPerPost allows up to 3 posts a day per blog), but if it's of no longer term value to me I prefer to avoid it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Take a look at this post: &lt;a href="http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/03/03/freebies-in-exchange-for-advertising/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/03/03/freebies-in-exchange-for-advertising/"&gt;http://www.u-g-h.com/index....&lt;/a&gt;  It's a review of another website's promotion. I was paid for the post, but it was a fair and unbiased view of what I think about it. It's more material for my blog and I reckon the advertiser got some mileage out of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suppose I'm lucky in a way, blogging is just a hobby for me, so I can afford to be picky. Not sure what others who depend on blogging revenue would have to say about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Owen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's correct Vlad.  New Posties (PPP bloggers) can do the initial "Review My Post" (RMP) for $7.50, but they cannot keep doing them repeatedly after signup.  But, don't worry, there is a diverse set of sponsors/opps at PPP with sponsorships far greater than $7.50.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although you may want to confirm an official answer on what graphic to use for RMP, from an HTML standpoint, the image shown is distinct from the affiliate hyperlink -- suggesting you might be able to use a different graphic that integrates best with your blog design.  If you want the reviews, I think you'd still want the button in your template after every post -- giving audiences the broadest set of post topics to review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy: any feedback on RMP?  I posted my take here: &lt;a href="http://floridaventureblog.com/2007/02/market-your-blog-on-ppps-dime.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://floridaventureblog.com/2007/02/market-your-blog-on-ppps-dime.html"&gt;http://floridaventureblog.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like a win-win, no-brainer to drive affiliate and marketing benefits for every blogger out there, Postie or not...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VC Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's correct Vlad.  New Posties (PPP bloggers) can do the initial "Review My Post" (RMP) for $7.50, but they cannot keep doing them repeatedly after signup.  But, don't worry, there is a diverse set of sponsors/opps at PPP with sponsorships far greater than $7.50.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although you may want to confirm an official answer on what graphic to use for RMP, from an HTML standpoint, the image shown is distinct from the affiliate hyperlink -- suggesting you might be able to use a different graphic that integrates best with your blog design.  If you want the reviews, I think you'd still want the button in your template after every post -- giving audiences the broadest set of post topics to review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andy: any feedback on RMP?  I posted my take here: &lt;a href="http://floridaventureblog.com/2007/02/market-your-blog-on-ppps-dime.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://floridaventureblog.com/2007/02/market-your-blog-on-ppps-dime.html"&gt;http://floridaventureblog.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like a win-win, no-brainer to drive affiliate and marketing benefits for every blogger out there, Postie or not...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VC Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok I am going to do it. Just need to know for myself how this works. I agree the sign up button is very cleaver. Also since I signed up through your link, your posts is the only one available to me for review. I think this is in place so can't come back to your blog an keep reviewing other articles. I think once you reviewed the one through which you signed up. Clicking signup button on other posts does nto mean you will be allowed to review that post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok I am going to do it. Just need to know for myself how this works. I agree the sign up button is very cleaver. Also since I signed up through your link, your posts is the only one available to me for review. I think this is in place so can't come back to your blog an keep reviewing other articles. I think once you reviewed the one through which you signed up. Clicking signup button on other posts does nto mean you will be allowed to review that post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Posties where are you? - honestly I am not sure, I haven't actually done any PPP reviews, but as they do have this viral signup program now it seemed a shame not to include it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully one of my many postie readers will respond, or you could try the PPP forums which are very active.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:27:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Posties where are you? - honestly I am not sure, I haven't actually done any PPP reviews, but as they do have this viral signup program now it seemed a shame not to include it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hopefully one of my many postie readers will respond, or you could try the PPP forums which are very active.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:27:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Andy as usual. I actually joined the pay per post after reading this article, with the hope to let a "student" to make ann extra $5. I also wanted to give it atry myself by reviewing this post of your. But the code provided is not that attractive I was wondering if you new how free the reviewers are to modify the link code. In particular to what appears inthe text of the link.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Andy as usual. I actually joined the pay per post after reading this article, with the hope to let a "student" to make ann extra $5. I also wanted to give it atry myself by reviewing this post of your. But the code provided is not that attractive I was wondering if you new how free the reviewers are to modify the link code. In particular to what appears inthe text of the link.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:43:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-12523047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But not everyone thinks like you Andy or practice your level of professionalism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Somehow whenever I come across pay per post reviews, they always fall short of being remarkable. Ok, remarkable may be too strong a word here. Put it this way, it just doesn't make the mark of a good review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course I'm not referring to every single pay per post review but so far the ones I've observed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ReviewMe on the other hand has good reviewers and perhaps it is attibuted to the entry level that a blog must meet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, Pay Per Post would be great if I just want backlinks in the shortest period of time. 50 bucks would probably get me 10 backlinks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leonard Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:49:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is PayPerPost The Only Subject Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis Agree On?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/512/is-payperpost-the-only-subject-nick-denton-and-jason-calacanis-agree-on.html#comment-10988380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But not everyone thinks like you Andy or practice your level of professionalism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Somehow whenever I come across pay per post reviews, they always fall short of being remarkable. Ok, remarkable may be too strong a word here. Put it this way, it just doesn't make the mark of a good review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course I'm not referring to every single pay per post review but so far the ones I've observed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ReviewMe on the other hand has good reviewers and perhaps it is attibuted to the entry level that a blog must meet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, Pay Per Post would be great if I just want backlinks in the shortest period of time. 50 bucks would probably get me 10 backlinks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leonard Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:49:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>