-
Website
http://andybeard.eu/ -
Original page
http://andybeard.eu/730/digg-friends.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Gregg Gordon
6 comments · 1 points
-
Jonathan Dingman
4 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
2656 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
4 comments · 1 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
It's true, I have tons of people to add, but you only get to add four at a time and then you have to wait 4-5 mins to add another, by that time I am distracted as always by something else.
I will make it my goal to friend all the people who friend me, not only that but Digg them too.
Thanks for giving my a kick up the arse in such a public manner, haha.
It's true, I have tons of people to add, but you only get to add four at a time and then you have to wait 4-5 mins to add another, by that time I am distracted as always by something else.
I will make it my goal to friend all the people who friend me, not only that but Digg them too.
Thanks for giving my a kick up the arse in such a public manner, haha.
Now I need to go back and add you as my friend.
The thing is, I'm going to check and see if anyone has written a program to automatically befriend the people on Digg who have already befriended me.
//engtech did that with his Technorati program, so I'm sure some already has (or soon will) create the same type of puppy for Digg, one that gets around that "adding friends too fast" error message that I've also encountered.
Thanks Digg friend,
Paula
Now I need to go back and add you as my friend.
The thing is, I'm going to check and see if anyone has written a program to automatically befriend the people on Digg who have already befriended me.
//engtech did that with his Technorati program, so I'm sure some already has (or soon will) create the same type of puppy for Digg, one that gets around that "adding friends too fast" error message that I've also encountered.
Thanks Digg friend,
Paula
You have been on my Digg friends list for a while, you just haven't reciprocated yet.
You have been on my Digg friends list for a while, you just haven't reciprocated yet.
would you say that submitting your own posts to digg is not such a good idea?
A more influential name as the submitter does probably attract more Diggs.
If I had a really exclusive story (I have one in the process of editing), I would probably arrange for it to be submitted by someone with a little more credibility if it is good enough to be worthy of a wider audience.
I am not a top Digg user, but my account is becoming more influential, and I know my account on Stumbleupon is becoming more influential as well.
I guess I was asking because I am guilty of it. I do submit my own articles quiet frequently, not because they are news worthy but because I would like them to be indexed quicker. I probably should stop doing it, since it aggravates the so called top "diggers".
would you say that submitting your own posts to digg is not such a good idea?
A more influential name as the submitter does probably attract more Diggs.
If I had a really exclusive story (I have one in the process of editing), I would probably arrange for it to be submitted by someone with a little more credibility if it is good enough to be worthy of a wider audience.
I am not a top Digg user, but my account is becoming more influential, and I know my account on Stumbleupon is becoming more influential as well.
I guess I was asking because I am guilty of it. I do submit my own articles quiet frequently, not because they are news worthy but because I would like them to be indexed quicker. I probably should stop doing it, since it aggravates the so called top "diggers".
By the avatar of someone who isn't your friend, it shows "Add Friend" in green.
Just click to add friend...
http://digg.com/users/MakiMaki/profile
You can Add me as well if you want
http://digg.com/users/AndyBeard/profile
By the avatar of someone who isn't your friend, it shows "Add Friend" in green.
Just click to add friend...
http://digg.com/users/MakiMaki/profile
You can Add me as well if you want
http://digg.com/users/AndyBeard/profile
Many thanks for pointing this out Andy. Sometimes you have to state the flipping obvious...
It is not just potentially part of their strength of a particular account.
The friends tab shows what friends have Dugg
You can also see which stories friends have submitted and which they have commented on.
Many thanks for pointing this out Andy. Sometimes you have to state the flipping obvious...
It is not just potentially part of their strength of a particular account.
The friends tab shows what friends have Dugg
You can also see which stories friends have submitted and which they have commented on.
Nice tips here, thanx for that!!!
Can i put it in my blog??
TQ
:)
Nice tips here, thanx for that!!!
Can i put it in my blog??
TQ
:)
I've added you to my friends list. Had I known about your post, I would have dugg it for you.
Even though you receive a bury, you can still make it to popular or home page if enough vote for it afterwards, from what I've read. But I don't know if that pertains to one that's already made home page, it might not.
Vlad, from what I've seen with Diggers posting their own blogs' stories, it doesn't appear to be frowned upon if you're also posting more from other sites than you are your own. One main digger mentioned he submits about 90% from other sites.
As for getting indexed with your diggs for your own posts, I *think* that it has to make home page. I read something once that indicated something to that effect.
If you post too many of your own and they continually receive a bury, you'll get banned as being a spammer. So it's best to err on the side of caution.
I actually have read an opposite that it is enough 2-5 diggs in order to have your link found by Google. Google is crawling a lot of pages from Digg. Sure it would take much quicker if you hit the home page, but I have noticed a few times Google would pick up my posts within 24 hours from submitting them to Digg.
I've added you to my friends list. Had I known about your post, I would have dugg it for you.
Even though you receive a bury, you can still make it to popular or home page if enough vote for it afterwards, from what I've read. But I don't know if that pertains to one that's already made home page, it might not.
Vlad, from what I've seen with Diggers posting their own blogs' stories, it doesn't appear to be frowned upon if you're also posting more from other sites than you are your own. One main digger mentioned he submits about 90% from other sites.
As for getting indexed with your diggs for your own posts, I *think* that it has to make home page. I read something once that indicated something to that effect.
If you post too many of your own and they continually receive a bury, you'll get banned as being a spammer. So it's best to err on the side of caution.
I actually have read an opposite that it is enough 2-5 diggs in order to have your link found by Google. Google is crawling a lot of pages from Digg. Sure it would take much quicker if you hit the home page, but I have noticed a few times Google would pick up my posts within 24 hours from submitting them to Digg.
I'll definitely be using this. Maybe this is one of the reasons I'm not getting the traffic I'd like! ;-)
I'll definitely be using this. Maybe this is one of the reasons I'm not getting the traffic I'd like! ;-)
Thank You
Thank You
I ask because if that's the case, it may be better to NOT reciprocate as many friendships.
You also have to think of spheres of influence. Your 100 reciprocated friends are going to most likely be different to the 100 friends I reciprocate with.
There will certainly be some overlap among the most active diggers, but I doubt Digg would have the ability to see who befriended you if you were not meant to also use it in some way.
I don't see many of the top Digg users avoiding reciprocating friends, and at the same time I can easily spot relationships where people have deliberately not reciprocated.
That being said, apparently one active Digg users just got banned for digging too much, so maybe Digg are monitoring click-throughs and intervals between Diggs.
I ask because if that's the case, it may be better to NOT reciprocate as many friendships.
You also have to think of spheres of influence. Your 100 reciprocated friends are going to most likely be different to the 100 friends I reciprocate with.
There will certainly be some overlap among the most active diggers, but I doubt Digg would have the ability to see who befriended you if you were not meant to also use it in some way.
I don't see many of the top Digg users avoiding reciprocating friends, and at the same time I can easily spot relationships where people have deliberately not reciprocated.
That being said, apparently one active Digg users just got banned for digging too much, so maybe Digg are monitoring click-throughs and intervals between Diggs.
I'm not a huge Digg user but i try & Digg my peeps whenever they ask or i get a chance too*
I'm still a little clueless as to How U actually get people to Digg yer Article - short of doing an Email Blast to yer Friendz asking them to???
I came across U cuz yer featured on BlogCatalog which i like & i'm also a Big Fan of MyBlogLog which has delivered some much needed Viewers ie Traffic to my Blog - so i have to give them Full Props for that!! Also i've met some amazing people + seen some awesome Blogs that otherwise i'm sure i never would have found!!
Cheers Andy!! Billy ;))
Peace*
I'm not a huge Digg user but i try & Digg my peeps whenever they ask or i get a chance too*
I'm still a little clueless as to How U actually get people to Digg yer Article - short of doing an Email Blast to yer Friendz asking them to???
I came across U cuz yer featured on BlogCatalog which i like & i'm also a Big Fan of MyBlogLog which has delivered some much needed Viewers ie Traffic to my Blog - so i have to give them Full Props for that!! Also i've met some amazing people + seen some awesome Blogs that otherwise i'm sure i never would have found!!
Cheers Andy!! Billy ;))
Peace*
yeah i did have 1 Friend to begin with ilkeryoldas! but thass more to my being in Love with his Natalia Icon!!
;PPP
U know it's Funny i tried to spend a Few minutes of MY Time on Digg adding Friendz & after adding 4 who i recognize & then deciding to do the Search to add AndyBeard the author of the Blog article - I received a Warning from DIGG that i was adding Friendz TOO FAST!!
Like SCREW that!!
DIGG is no more a Social Network than fly*
a waste of time maybe trying to Help yer Friendz out but not much else*
;))
As I said in the article
As to how this is used, once you have a few friends you will see multiple ways that Digg tells you about what your friends have dugg. You can see what they have commented on, submitted, and the friends tab can show you what all your friends have recently Dugg.
That way when you go to Digg an article on someone's blog, you can also spend a few minutes seeing what else your friends have found cool.
yeah i did have 1 Friend to begin with ilkeryoldas! but thass more to my being in Love with his Natalia Icon!!
;PPP
U know it's Funny i tried to spend a Few minutes of MY Time on Digg adding Friendz & after adding 4 who i recognize & then deciding to do the Search to add AndyBeard the author of the Blog article - I received a Warning from DIGG that i was adding Friendz TOO FAST!!
Like SCREW that!!
DIGG is no more a Social Network than fly*
a waste of time maybe trying to Help yer Friendz out but not much else*
;))
As I said in the article
As to how this is used, once you have a few friends you will see multiple ways that Digg tells you about what your friends have dugg. You can see what they have commented on, submitted, and the friends tab can show you what all your friends have recently Dugg.
That way when you go to Digg an article on someone's blog, you can also spend a few minutes seeing what else your friends have found cool.
It's a mistake to think you can "trick" your way on. You may get a blip out of it, but you will soon get hammered and have the mark of Cain burnt on your forehead.
Also, it's really about getting on digg, it's about using digg to get people to your article and then getting them to link to it. Unless you article is kick ass, killer, double helping of mind melting conent, it wont do much.
You might think, "Oh sure, Lyndon's cracked it, like we didn't know that already". But it's not as simple as that, you have to take into account what makes people acually vote for your story and actually vote. It's as difficult as an ad agency trying to figure out how to sell a packet of wash powder.
If you can't write, then I suggest you hire someone who can.
It's a mistake to think you can "trick" your way on. You may get a blip out of it, but you will soon get hammered and have the mark of Cain burnt on your forehead.
Also, it's really about getting on digg, it's about using digg to get people to your article and then getting them to link to it. Unless you article is kick ass, killer, double helping of mind melting conent, it wont do much.
You might think, "Oh sure, Lyndon's cracked it, like we didn't know that already". But it's not as simple as that, you have to take into account what makes people acually vote for your story and actually vote. It's as difficult as an ad agency trying to figure out how to sell a packet of wash powder.
If you can't write, then I suggest you hire someone who can.