<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/green_pixel_dust_has_a_negative_82/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:42:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This reminds me of the go around on Nigerian Scammers.  Sell them something...how brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:42:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This reminds me of the go around on Nigerian Scammers.  Sell them something...how brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:42:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreeing with Mark Rae above - outsourcing for the moderation may be in a person's best interest - leave it to India! (For this task anyway)  Where is the line drawn for link dropping and genuine responses?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Search Engine Optimization Jou</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreeing with Mark Rae above - outsourcing for the moderation may be in a person's best interest - leave it to India! (For this task anyway)  Where is the line drawn for link dropping and genuine responses?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Search Engine Optimization Jou</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;About the Top Commenter plugin, I set it to count comments over the last 30 days so it doesn't renew the first of every month. Comments fall off after 30 days, creating a rolling effect. Not sure if you can do that with the widget version, but in the regular version you set the "reset" option to 30 (through the plugin editor).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:21:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;About the Top Commenter plugin, I set it to count comments over the last 30 days so it doesn't renew the first of every month. Comments fall off after 30 days, creating a rolling effect. Not sure if you can do that with the widget version, but in the regular version you set the "reset" option to 30 (through the plugin editor).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:21:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vey good point. Moderating the comments can become a full-time job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words you can become a victim of your success...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am afraid I am not sure there is a solution to that problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I do is as follows: I outsource the job to India and I pay $1.20 per hour for this job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Rae is building his websi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:31:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vey good point. Moderating the comments can become a full-time job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words you can become a victim of your success...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am afraid I am not sure there is a solution to that problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I do is as follows: I outsource the job to India and I pay $1.20 per hour for this job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Rae is building his websi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:31:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wish google would make up their mind and stop plpaying with their algarithims. it seems one day they want us to do one thing and the next day another. very frustrating that we need to chop and change to meet their requirements. As for spamming, the only way to monetize them is impression based advertising, at least its worth a few bucks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rob mac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just wish google would make up their mind and stop plpaying with their algarithims. it seems one day they want us to do one thing and the next day another. very frustrating that we need to chop and change to meet their requirements. As for spamming, the only way to monetize them is impression based advertising, at least its worth a few bucks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rob mac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527968</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey Comment Spammer, You Need Better Spam Tools&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is pretty funny. Rude, in the face and yet they will follow the link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe addressing them as comment marketers might increase the click thru.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993581</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey Comment Spammer, You Need Better Spam Tools&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is pretty funny. Rude, in the face and yet they will follow the link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe addressing them as comment marketers might increase the click thru.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah - you just blew my mind.  Of course the natural reaction to spammy comments/activities is irritation - but to turn it around and use what you can see to be a targeted demographic as a revenue stream?  Brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly I need to elevate my game.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah - you just blew my mind.  Of course the natural reaction to spammy comments/activities is irritation - but to turn it around and use what you can see to be a targeted demographic as a revenue stream?  Brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly I need to elevate my game.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dropped from a PR5 to a PR4 this last go 'round, which makes more sense to me compared to other sites around (much as it hurts to admit it.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny that comment spam volume dropped within a day or so. Guess there is a little silver lining to loosing a little favor with the Google gods.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Cree</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dropped from a PR5 to a PR4 this last go 'round, which makes more sense to me compared to other sites around (much as it hurts to admit it.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny that comment spam volume dropped within a day or so. Guess there is a little silver lining to loosing a little favor with the Google gods.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Cree</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:41:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The top commenter plugin has actually been highlighted in an ebook soon to be released, and probably sold to 10,000+ people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is certain to get worse soon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The top commenter plugin has actually been highlighted in an ebook soon to be released, and probably sold to 10,000+ people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is certain to get worse soon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-10993577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And this week I have to be on the lookout a lot for spammers because of the top commenter plugin. Batches of comments from the same people all right after the first of the month. The time it's numbers reset. I have seen a lot of what I would consider bigger bloggers doing this also. I am considering taking it off, but for now have it on just my index. You would think doing this was a lot of work for a link that will only last a month.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green Pixel Dust Has A Negative</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1259/green-pixel-dust-has-a-negative.html#comment-12527964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And this week I have to be on the lookout a lot for spammers because of the top commenter plugin. Batches of comments from the same people all right after the first of the month. The time it's numbers reset. I have seen a lot of what I would consider bigger bloggers doing this also. I am considering taking it off, but for now have it on just my index. You would think doing this was a lot of work for a link that will only last a month.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephan Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>