<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/google_reputation_management_disaster_with_open_social_37/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:46:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992078</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18 months later, and the "Google Wariness" continues. To be fair though, as they evolve further into the corporate behemoth, it's difficult for them to maintain their "do no evil" mantra, despite their best efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides their attempt to clamp down on Google-branded domains (which they are still failing at), they have also recently cut out the free PPC budgets to charities, thus sinking further to the dark side...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brand Yourself</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18 months later, and the "Google Wariness" continues. To be fair though, as they evolve further into the corporate behemoth, it's difficult for them to maintain their "do no evil" mantra, despite their best efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides their attempt to clamp down on Google-branded domains (which they are still failing at), they have also recently cut out the free PPC budgets to charities, thus sinking further to the dark side...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brand Yourself</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, looks like with the help of a few friends, Google finally waking up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sphinn.com/story/13673" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sphinn.com/story/13673"&gt;http://sphinn.com/story/13673&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Igor The Troll&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igorthetroll</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, looks like with the help of a few friends, Google finally waking up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sphinn.com/story/13673" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sphinn.com/story/13673"&gt;http://sphinn.com/story/13673&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Igor The Troll&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igorthetroll</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go for it, you deserve it, for all your hard work to uphold GQG! I figure the little g is more powerful than the big G.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igorthetroll</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Go for it, you deserve it, for all your hard work to uphold GQG! I figure the little g is more powerful than the big G.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igorthetroll</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Igor I should stick that next to a PayPerPost logo ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as the quality guidelines go, I am convinced I comply to both the letter and the spirit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't even plan to charge more now I have sitelinks ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Igor I should stick that next to a PayPerPost logo ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as the quality guidelines go, I am convinced I comply to both the letter and the spirit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't even plan to charge more now I have sitelinks ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, I wonder how Google will feel about this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.googlepatrol.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.googlepatrol.org/"&gt;www.googlepatrol.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igorthetroll</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, I wonder how Google will feel about this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.googlepatrol.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.googlepatrol.org/"&gt;www.googlepatrol.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igorthetroll</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is definitely great material :) I sphunn u :D I wonder how will they perform.. but then again, when you got the money, it's most likely successful.. it's just the matter of how much you wanna pump in?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Woo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is definitely great material :) I sphunn u :D I wonder how will they perform.. but then again, when you got the money, it's most likely successful.. it's just the matter of how much you wanna pump in?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Woo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, I love your posts and comment regularly on them.  This is one of the best that I have read.  I can not but  feel that this is getting to be a David vs Goliath situation.  Having been a corporate man all my life, I still do not understand how Google is still not getting into damage control mode.  There are too many bloggers complaining and G does not seem to care.  Does not augur well for their future.  Yes, it is immaterial what their stock quotes at.  We have seen a lot of companies who had that and lost it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amish Furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, I love your posts and comment regularly on them.  This is one of the best that I have read.  I can not but  feel that this is getting to be a David vs Goliath situation.  Having been a corporate man all my life, I still do not understand how Google is still not getting into damage control mode.  There are too many bloggers complaining and G does not seem to care.  Does not augur well for their future.  Yes, it is immaterial what their stock quotes at.  We have seen a lot of companies who had that and lost it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amish Furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent post. I would love to hear what Joseph Smarr, Marc Canter, Robert Scoble, and Michael Arrington think about this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe they are too busy talking with their lawyers to comment ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent post. I would love to hear what Joseph Smarr, Marc Canter, Robert Scoble, and Michael Arrington think about this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe they are too busy talking with their lawyers to comment ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Open Social? Please.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about starting with a little "social responsibility" first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professional athletes may not want to be role models... too bad, they are. They don't have to like it. Doesn't matter. Because of the influence they wield, they have a social responsibility to behave as such.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about you Google? With the flick of a switch, the turn of a dial, you have a direct influence on millions of people, many times on a very personal level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about recognizing the responsibity you have for the influence you wield and behave accordingly? How about acknowledging the possibility that it may have been you that made a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CrankyDave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Open Social? Please.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about starting with a little "social responsibility" first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professional athletes may not want to be role models... too bad, they are. They don't have to like it. Doesn't matter. Because of the influence they wield, they have a social responsibility to behave as such.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about you Google? With the flick of a switch, the turn of a dial, you have a direct influence on millions of people, many times on a very personal level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about recognizing the responsibity you have for the influence you wield and behave accordingly? How about acknowledging the possibility that it may have been you that made a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CrankyDave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First let me say you have an excellent blog!!! You are stating a welcome truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the Google Empire, I have always felt that they had too much say and control with what is allowed or indexed on the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Per other comments, they almost remind me of businesses wanting to sell their inventory at Walmart, they have to meet all the price settings as dictated by Walmart, or no sell to Walmart, I remember watching a CNBC show on Walmart, rings almost of Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When will Google take over Walmart?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the powers that be at Google, what Lord Acton stated &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cruise Control</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:15:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First let me say you have an excellent blog!!! You are stating a welcome truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the Google Empire, I have always felt that they had too much say and control with what is allowed or indexed on the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Per other comments, they almost remind me of businesses wanting to sell their inventory at Walmart, they have to meet all the price settings as dictated by Walmart, or no sell to Walmart, I remember watching a CNBC show on Walmart, rings almost of Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When will Google take over Walmart?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the powers that be at Google, what Lord Acton stated &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cruise Control</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:15:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google just collecting information in each and every way. They care about your privacy, they collect each every infomation using Gmail, Reader, Google talk, these all service are spyware to collect maximum information. They are using there Pagerank in a wrong way. Don't see your Google pagerank now!.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blog Opinion</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google just collecting information in each and every way. They care about your privacy, they collect each every infomation using Gmail, Reader, Google talk, these all service are spyware to collect maximum information. They are using there Pagerank in a wrong way. Don't see your Google pagerank now!.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blog Opinion</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;br&gt;I really enjoy reading your posts(and have subscribed).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have one question. Is google trying to become the Microsoft of the internet and dictating how we all use. I get the feeling they trying to force all web page owners to do it all 'their or else'. I am new to blogging and at present don't really care about google's ranking of pages. To me Alexis is a real indication as to how my pages are performing. Is Alexis relevant now?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cheers les&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your site has been reviewed by the radical blogger = you can see the results here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://myradicalblogs.com/?page_id=38" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://myradicalblogs.com/?page_id=38"&gt;http://myradicalblogs.com/?...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may take several hours for the front page article to appear. You review however has been published.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">les</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:00:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-10992066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;br&gt;I really enjoy reading your posts(and have subscribed).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have one question. Is google trying to become the Microsoft of the internet and dictating how we all use. I get the feeling they trying to force all web page owners to do it all 'their or else'. I am new to blogging and at present don't really care about google's ranking of pages. To me Alexis is a real indication as to how my pages are performing. Is Alexis relevant now?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cheers les&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your site has been reviewed by the radical blogger = you can see the results here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://myradicalblogs.com/?page_id=38" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://myradicalblogs.com/?page_id=38"&gt;http://myradicalblogs.com/?...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may take several hours for the front page article to appear. You review however has been published.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">les</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:00:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reputation Management Disaster With Open Social</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1064/google-reputation-management-disaster-with-open-social.html#comment-12526507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm delighted to have found this blog.  You right on to call out Google on this usurping of Open Social name.  I hate to say it but I have grown very weary of Google's business practices as of late.  I hope these are just mistakes of a young company that's having trouble dealing with their enormous success, but every day I these "mistakes" seem more premeditated and disregarding... surely someone attorney at Google would have spoken up that they just can't take someone else's name...  right?  Or what, or perhaps some attorney did speak up, only to say "yeah, let's just take it, we're Google, we can do whatever we want".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Careful Google, you can't keep this up forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WebsiteAnalystinDC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:34:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>