<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/google_reconsideration_or_reinclusion_request_44/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:37:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did this work for you, the reconsideration request? I'm quite interested since I need to send in some requests for some of my sites.. I want to know if this approach works ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;~ Trader&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:37:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did this work for you, the reconsideration request? I'm quite interested since I need to send in some requests for some of my sites.. I want to know if this approach works ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;~ Trader&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trader</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:37:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy- something for sidebar widgets would be fantastic!!! I love your nofollow dupes plugin- HIGHLY under rated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I look forward to a possible plugin  :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck with your re-inclusion. It must have been a hard decision for you to make.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa J. Stewart- Big Foot Web </dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy- something for sidebar widgets would be fantastic!!! I love your nofollow dupes plugin- HIGHLY under rated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I look forward to a possible plugin  :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck with your re-inclusion. It must have been a hard decision for you to make.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa J. Stewart- Big Foot Web </dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm wondering the same thing Jack is. Paid links do occasionally show on my main page, And setting robots.txt not to index may main page would probably be just short of suicidal in terms of spidering.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure I could remedy links showing on the main page if I had to, I doubt that it would harm my revenue stream significantly.  I'm very interested to know if Google will honor your request.  Just like Jack, the site I'm referring to dropped from an estimated PR5 to a PR0 overnight.  While the loss hasn't cost me a single visitor, it IS putting a dent in my ability to gain advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep us informed!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerry Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm wondering the same thing Jack is. Paid links do occasionally show on my main page, And setting robots.txt not to index may main page would probably be just short of suicidal in terms of spidering.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure I could remedy links showing on the main page if I had to, I doubt that it would harm my revenue stream significantly.  I'm very interested to know if Google will honor your request.  Just like Jack, the site I'm referring to dropped from an estimated PR5 to a PR0 overnight.  While the loss hasn't cost me a single visitor, it IS putting a dent in my ability to gain advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keep us informed!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerry Russell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This will be super interesting to see how this pans out with Google. Keep us all posted on the response from the "Dont Be Evil" corporation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Deangelo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This will be super interesting to see how this pans out with Google. Keep us all posted on the response from the "Dont Be Evil" corporation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Deangelo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jack&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only pages on my site that have external links from within the content are my permalink pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of the most overlooked SEO plugins is something I knocked up a while ago&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes"&gt;http://andybeard.eu/wordpre...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I should really do something for people who have dodgy themes with a sitewide sidebar using widgets as well&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jack&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only pages on my site that have external links from within the content are my permalink pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of the most overlooked SEO plugins is something I knocked up a while ago&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes"&gt;http://andybeard.eu/wordpre...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I should really do something for people who have dodgy themes with a sitewide sidebar using widgets as well&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being blocked by Google sounds like a really painful process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I curious how exactly does one decipher or identify paid reviews?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reginald</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being blocked by Google sounds like a really painful process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I curious how exactly does one decipher or identify paid reviews?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reginald</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy I have one major question about the way you are blocking robots and how it satisfies the requirements of Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My understanding and please correct me if I am wrong is all your paid reviews go into a common directory and that directory is noindexed.  Fine I get that and you nofollow links on duplicated pages like anything using /search etc.  Great got it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My question is there not still an issue with the post when it is on the first page of your blog?  During that time is it not both crawlable and able to pass juice.  Sure it is only there until you post enough to bring it off page one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not poking holes mind you, I am looking to do the same thing on my former PR5 now PR0 blog.  Just wondering how to handle that last loophole.  Can't wait to hear what you get as a response from Google by the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Spirko</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy I have one major question about the way you are blocking robots and how it satisfies the requirements of Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My understanding and please correct me if I am wrong is all your paid reviews go into a common directory and that directory is noindexed.  Fine I get that and you nofollow links on duplicated pages like anything using /search etc.  Great got it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My question is there not still an issue with the post when it is on the first page of your blog?  During that time is it not both crawlable and able to pass juice.  Sure it is only there until you post enough to bring it off page one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not poking holes mind you, I am looking to do the same thing on my former PR5 now PR0 blog.  Just wondering how to handle that last loophole.  Can't wait to hear what you get as a response from Google by the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Spirko</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is KILLING US! In te words of Jim Cramer "they know NOTHING!" But seriously, the amount of turmoil they have caused in the blogosphere is almost criminal. They have sacrificed content in favor of ranking... and I don't like it one but. Best of luck to you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is KILLING US! In te words of Jim Cramer "they know NOTHING!" But seriously, the amount of turmoil they have caused in the blogosphere is almost criminal. They have sacrificed content in favor of ranking... and I don't like it one but. Best of luck to you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, good luck with your reconsideration request.  Given the way you have worded your request, I'm really curious to see what will happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, good luck with your reconsideration request.  Given the way you have worded your request, I'm really curious to see what will happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I earn money from Google through Adsense - should I nofollow every link to Google and Google services now?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great point, Andy. Not much to add here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tomaz Mencinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I earn money from Google through Adsense - should I nofollow every link to Google and Google services now?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great point, Andy. Not much to add here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tomaz Mencinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:17:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that your way approaching the issue should be actually accepted as a standard among PPP bloggers. I am not trying to kiss up here. I have changed my position on paid reviews. I think most of bloggers not attempt pay reviews if they can't follow your example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am looking forward to update on this. Maybe Matt Cutts will graciously offer you a tip of the heat for setting an example.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:15:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that your way approaching the issue should be actually accepted as a standard among PPP bloggers. I am not trying to kiss up here. I have changed my position on paid reviews. I think most of bloggers not attempt pay reviews if they can't follow your example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am looking forward to update on this. Maybe Matt Cutts will graciously offer you a tip of the heat for setting an example.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:15:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-12527846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, please keep us updated with any new developments, either in the way of responses (which I would expect you would not actually get) or in demonstrable  changes to the penalties themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the post not appearing in the serps... there seems to be an issue with my site at the moment, and it is having trouble keeping pages indexed in a non-supplemental kind of way. I'm pretty sure I know the reasons why, but am looking into the circumstances surrounding those whys at the moment. :) I will let you know what I find out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993450</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, please keep us updated with any new developments, either in the way of responses (which I would expect you would not actually get) or in demonstrable  changes to the penalties themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the post not appearing in the serps... there seems to be an issue with my site at the moment, and it is having trouble keeping pages indexed in a non-supplemental kind of way. I'm pretty sure I know the reasons why, but am looking into the circumstances surrounding those whys at the moment. :) I will let you know what I find out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1247/google-reconsideration-request.html#comment-10993449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks for letting us in on your Google reconsideration request process, it's very interesting. Let's hope Google will value the points you put forward as much as i'm sure many of us do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards, Pete&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete from Home Made Online Inc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:08:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>