-
Website
http://andybeard.eu/ -
Original page
http://andybeard.eu/1056/google-pagerank-joke-of-the-blogosphere.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
authorityseo
4 comments · 18 points
-
Jonathan Dingman
4 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
2656 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
4 comments · 1 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Many bloggers seem to be taking the stance "who cares about Google anyways" which is probably not the best strategy :)
It was the main focus of Larry and Sergei's original paper ( http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html) and I'm sure it still does play a large factor in trust of content.
I am fully aware of the importance of various forms of Google Juice, one of my main forte's is Wordpress SEO after all.
At the end of the day Google needs publishers just as much as publishers need Google, but the difference is publishers have alternative sources of revenue and traffic.
I don't argue with that, the problem is that meaningless little green bar. Can you think of one reason to publish such a thing.
Why was it that it was wrong to install the Alexa toolbar?
Agh, it's spyware they say. What Alexa never did was profile everything you do on the net and connect it to you through Webmaster Tools, email accounts, searches, auto queries, Google Analytics(yes you leave tracks there too) and now whether or not you no follow links.
AOL at one time was unstoppable, look at them now, most people are even appalled at the idea of having a free email address with @aol.com.
Google creates absolutely no content of it's own, now it's going to punish high PR sites that rake them in alot of cash, if I was Google I'd be scared.
Hmm, maybe we should charge Google every time Googlebot rips off our content>??
Many bloggers seem to be taking the stance "who cares about Google anyways" which is probably not the best strategy :)
It was the main focus of Larry and Sergei's original paper ( http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html) and I'm sure it still does play a large factor in trust of content.
I am fully aware of the importance of various forms of Google Juice, one of my main forte's is Wordpress SEO after all.
At the end of the day Google needs publishers just as much as publishers need Google, but the difference is publishers have alternative sources of revenue and traffic.
I don't argue with that, the problem is that meaningless little green bar. Can you think of one reason to publish such a thing.
Why was it that it was wrong to install the Alexa toolbar?
Agh, it's spyware they say. What Alexa never did was profile everything you do on the net and connect it to you through Webmaster Tools, email accounts, searches, auto queries, Google Analytics(yes you leave tracks there too) and now whether or not you no follow links.
AOL at one time was unstoppable, look at them now, most people are even appalled at the idea of having a free email address with @aol.com.
Google creates absolutely no content of it's own, now it's going to punish high PR sites that rake them in alot of cash, if I was Google I'd be scared.
Hmm, maybe we should charge Google every time Googlebot rips off our content>??
I think it's all so ludicrous that you just have to laugh... There are some good submissions over at ProBlogger. One that made me laugh was from Matt Jones "The bar is always greener on the other blog".
Thanks for the mention. I did a brief post (which also links to "bohica" for those not familiar with the term).
I think it's all so ludicrous that you just have to laugh... There are some good submissions over at ProBlogger. One that made me laugh was from Matt Jones "The bar is always greener on the other blog".
Thanks for the mention. I did a brief post (which also links to "bohica" for those not familiar with the term).
When Jaan told me he'd submitted the pic to Matt for consideration for his Halloween costume, my initial reaction was "aww crap" but now I think "What the heck. What's the worse thing that couple happen? A little slap never hurt anyone".
At least that what my local Tory MP told me, anyway...
When Jaan told me he'd submitted the pic to Matt for consideration for his Halloween costume, my initial reaction was "aww crap" but now I think "What the heck. What's the worse thing that couple happen? A little slap never hurt anyone".
At least that what my local Tory MP told me, anyway...
I didn't know what bohica stood for until I looked in Google(bend over here it comes again).
I think Google might be shooting themselves in the foot with this kind of public slapping, particularly when there's no clear explanation for the "mischief" - I am talking of cases such as problogger and copyblogger who have enough links outside of B5 and are well respected. While some networks certainly take advantage of links for their own members and seek to get the most of it from Google, it's a natural thing that those blogs should interlink fairly often for traffic reasons- remember weblogs inc blogroll in 2003/2004? It's Google job to devaluate those links if it finds them not worthy, not to slap those involved.
What happened to "make sites as if google didn't exist?"
I didn't know what bohica stood for until I looked in Google(bend over here it comes again).
I think Google might be shooting themselves in the foot with this kind of public slapping, particularly when there's no clear explanation for the "mischief" - I am talking of cases such as problogger and copyblogger who have enough links outside of B5 and are well respected. While some networks certainly take advantage of links for their own members and seek to get the most of it from Google, it's a natural thing that those blogs should interlink fairly often for traffic reasons- remember weblogs inc blogroll in 2003/2004? It's Google job to devaluate those links if it finds them not worthy, not to slap those involved.
What happened to "make sites as if google didn't exist?"
'Mullenweg & Google sitting in a tree. K.I.S.S....'
;-)
'Mullenweg & Google sitting in a tree. K.I.S.S....'
;-)
I remember events like the "Florida" update a few years back that had a much greater impact on the webmaster community than this silly change! :D
I wouldn't say they've "become" anything - this is nothing new and I totally expect zero reaction from Google. :)
I remember events like the "Florida" update a few years back that had a much greater impact on the webmaster community than this silly change! :D
I wouldn't say they've "become" anything - this is nothing new and I totally expect zero reaction from Google. :)
Nothing like a bit of a PR mistake on the part of Google. Yahoo and MSN should be jumping at this chance to do something better than Google for a change.
Nothing like a bit of a PR mistake on the part of Google. Yahoo and MSN should be jumping at this chance to do something better than Google for a change.
As a result, they will continue to act like the 900 lb gorilla until their actions begin costing them market share amongst those who search.
Until then, those of us who want to be found have two choices.
1) We can bend over, grit our teeth and say, "Thank you sir! May I have another!" (Animal House)
2) We can invest in other ways for people to find us a.k.a "traditional" methods of marketing and advertising.
Unfortunately, #2 isn't a viable option for anyone seeking to reach a global audience.
As for me, I'll gladly root for anyone up to the task of dethroning the mighty Google. Then again, I always liked the underdog!
As a result, they will continue to act like the 900 lb gorilla until their actions begin costing them market share amongst those who search.
Until then, those of us who want to be found have two choices.
1) We can bend over, grit our teeth and say, "Thank you sir! May I have another!" (Animal House)
2) We can invest in other ways for people to find us a.k.a "traditional" methods of marketing and advertising.
Unfortunately, #2 isn't a viable option for anyone seeking to reach a global audience.
As for me, I'll gladly root for anyone up to the task of dethroning the mighty Google. Then again, I always liked the underdog!
Fish that live in a small pond tend to believe that there's nothing outside that pond, and that in turn magnifies their sense of self-importance. They also tend to be astonished, and upset, when they get yanked out of that pond by a hook and line. The SEO pond is tiny compared to the rest of the world, and for those in it to believe that they can have a serious effect on Google is delusional. Let it go, and move on.
Fish that live in a small pond tend to believe that there's nothing outside that pond, and that in turn magnifies their sense of self-importance. They also tend to be astonished, and upset, when they get yanked out of that pond by a hook and line. The SEO pond is tiny compared to the rest of the world, and for those in it to believe that they can have a serious effect on Google is delusional. Let it go, and move on.
I just wanted to let you know that ironically PageRank is updating right now. This is the real toolbar update, and it looks like you will probably be back to a PR4.
I've checked about 20 and there are changes on all of them - this is the real thing. I posted about the changes here:
http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/10/26/now-for-th...
I just wanted to let you know that ironically PageRank is updating right now. This is the real toolbar update, and it looks like you will probably be back to a PR4.
I've checked about 20 and there are changes on all of them - this is the real thing. I posted about the changes here:
http://courtneytuttle.com/2007/10/26/now-for-th...
Like you said in your comment Andy, Google does need publishers, at the moment the power is with Google. One large entity against millions of tiny individual entities is not a fair playing field in the business world, unless collectively the millions of tiny individual entities organise themselves and vote with their feet and look for a better deal.
Like you said in your comment Andy, Google does need publishers, at the moment the power is with Google. One large entity against millions of tiny individual entities is not a fair playing field in the business world, unless collectively the millions of tiny individual entities organise themselves and vote with their feet and look for a better deal.
(Just as soon as I get my Adsence $$ first ;) )
(Just as soon as I get my Adsence $$ first ;) )
I've always found it rather ironic that the blogoshpere has so long relied on Google to tell us how valuable our pages are through a static value like PR. We can far more accurately measure the value of our pages anyway - by looking at the type and volume of traffic passing through, and analysing what they are doing.
Using real traffic data more (as opposed to something like alexa!) is a logical step forward, I think. Hopefully after this latest bout of PR bashing, everyone can stop talking about it, and instead start talking about the alternatives already out there, that we can further develop to serve the comunity.
I've always found it rather ironic that the blogoshpere has so long relied on Google to tell us how valuable our pages are through a static value like PR. We can far more accurately measure the value of our pages anyway - by looking at the type and volume of traffic passing through, and analysing what they are doing.
Using real traffic data more (as opposed to something like alexa!) is a logical step forward, I think. Hopefully after this latest bout of PR bashing, everyone can stop talking about it, and instead start talking about the alternatives already out there, that we can further develop to serve the comunity.
Without us, Google goes down.
Without us, Google goes down.
Why?
To expand on that..
a) why without Google would we be down and out, their are hundreds of other engines and services Google does nothing unique or different except combine them in a neat package?
b) Why should we work hand in hand with a company that many no longer trusts, Google is a huge company but it has to make a profit it makes a profit from you through advertising the only way to change its attitude and opinion is to stop using it. But even if every single webmaster, site owner and developer stopped using every Google service completely and all at once barring the webmaster tool team do you think anyone would notice?
Forget working with the relatively meager online community, they are taking their empire into the "real" world, into TV, radio, and billboards. Markets that see even more viewers than the most popular sites. Google will be just as strong armed there as they are with us little guys.
The blogosphere and online community can change it, but it will take a real united effort. They are a monopoly, and we gave it to them.
Why?
To expand on that..
a) why without Google would we be down and out, their are hundreds of other engines and services Google does nothing unique or different except combine them in a neat package?
b) Why should we work hand in hand with a company that many no longer trusts, Google is a huge company but it has to make a profit it makes a profit from you through advertising the only way to change its attitude and opinion is to stop using it. But even if every single webmaster, site owner and developer stopped using every Google service completely and all at once barring the webmaster tool team do you think anyone would notice?
Forget working with the relatively meager online community, they are taking their empire into the "real" world, into TV, radio, and billboards. Markets that see even more viewers than the most popular sites. Google will be just as strong armed there as they are with us little guys.
The blogosphere and online community can change it, but it will take a real united effort. They are a monopoly, and we gave it to them.
In all seriousness, I don't think people in the seo community would care as much if they just explained why and what they are doing instead of leaving us guessing.
Most of us are trying to do the right things and follow their guidelines. Yet when they make them so vague, it's hard to know where to draw the line.
And on one hand Matt tells us that his blog is his "private blog" then he posts "I am having a meeting, tell me what your suggestions are". Is'nt that work related? And then the next post ios about what his costume should be, and I am sucked into reading it and waisting 10 minutes of my life and thinking " who cares"
I'm out. Thanks
In all seriousness, I don't think people in the seo community would care as much if they just explained why and what they are doing instead of leaving us guessing.
Most of us are trying to do the right things and follow their guidelines. Yet when they make them so vague, it's hard to know where to draw the line.
And on one hand Matt tells us that his blog is his "private blog" then he posts "I am having a meeting, tell me what your suggestions are". Is'nt that work related? And then the next post ios about what his costume should be, and I am sucked into reading it and waisting 10 minutes of my life and thinking " who cares"
I'm out. Thanks
Cheers
Cheers
I'll go on doing what I have been doing. (ppp). I like it, I learn something new every day, and it will take my family on holiday next year. Google won't.
I'll go on doing what I have been doing. (ppp). I like it, I learn something new every day, and it will take my family on holiday next year. Google won't.