<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/friendfeed_flaws_8211_the_wrong_kind_of_attention_grabbing_61/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:40:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew, you have pointed out the reasons I got frustrated with Friendfeed. The slow stumble upon updates were ridiculous. Who wants things 8 hours late? By then they are old and newer information likely replaces it. Also,  why wouldn't you just comment on a post or tweet through the respective source? It's just flawed. Also, as Lyndon pointed out, it seems these sites are popping up like crazy; same stuff, new mix. It's getting old real fast. Friendfeed has some potential, but it has some critical flaws to fix. (Which may have been fixed, but I'm tried around this post date.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Sean&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:40:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew, you have pointed out the reasons I got frustrated with Friendfeed. The slow stumble upon updates were ridiculous. Who wants things 8 hours late? By then they are old and newer information likely replaces it. Also,  why wouldn't you just comment on a post or tweet through the respective source? It's just flawed. Also, as Lyndon pointed out, it seems these sites are popping up like crazy; same stuff, new mix. It's getting old real fast. Friendfeed has some potential, but it has some critical flaws to fix. (Which may have been fixed, but I'm tried around this post date.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Sean&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:40:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Owen you will probably find having been involved with so many projects whilst at Google, that they know a lot of the founders of the services they support.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:04:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Owen you will probably find having been involved with so many projects whilst at Google, that they know a lot of the founders of the services they support.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:04:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find the site interesting because the only way they can get that data is via APIs. But almost all of those companies don't allow commercial use without approval. I'm curious as to whether they got approval or just went ahead and did it without approval. Since there are no ads that might be ok - until they raise x million dollars (as they did recently), at which point it seems clearly to be commercial.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ojbyrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find the site interesting because the only way they can get that data is via APIs. But almost all of those companies don't allow commercial use without approval. I'm curious as to whether they got approval or just went ahead and did it without approval. Since there are no ads that might be ok - until they raise x million dollars (as they did recently), at which point it seems clearly to be commercial.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ojbyrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's starts with more basic flaws than that - thousand ways to include data, but no way to exclude it, making redundent data over and over again. Plus as you said - you rather go to the source than to have it scattered in million places ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicole Simon (Berlin, Germany)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's starts with more basic flaws than that - thousand ways to include data, but no way to exclude it, making redundent data over and over again. Plus as you said - you rather go to the source than to have it scattered in million places ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicole Simon (Berlin, Germany)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul I just sent this to you by email so you get it quicker. This is the RSS feed you need to use&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard&amp;amp;comments;=1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard&amp;amp;comments;=1"&gt;http://www.stumbleupon.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It just has an extra parameter on the end to include the comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You would actually have to use both, because the version with comments only includes those sites you have written a review for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul I just sent this to you by email so you get it quicker. This is the RSS feed you need to use&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard&amp;amp;comments;=1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard&amp;amp;comments;=1"&gt;http://www.stumbleupon.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It just has an extra parameter on the end to include the comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You would actually have to use both, because the version with comments only includes those sites you have written a review for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry but I haven't even tried to get a beta invite - they normally involve some kind of non-disclosure agreement, and as I am partially involved with Blogcatalog, it wouldn't be right for me to apply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry but I haven't even tried to get a beta invite - they normally involve some kind of non-disclosure agreement, and as I am partially involved with Blogcatalog, it wouldn't be right for me to apply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback Andy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feeds should all update within about 30 minutes, and many will update within a minute or two. I'm looking into why your Stumbleupon feed is taking longer to update -- that certainly sounds like a problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, including your Stumbleupon comments would be a nice feature, but they don't appear to be included in the Stumbleupon RSS feed: &lt;a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard"&gt;http://www.stumbleupon.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Buchheit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:33:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback Andy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feeds should all update within about 30 minutes, and many will update within a minute or two. I'm looking into why your Stumbleupon feed is taking longer to update -- that certainly sounds like a problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, including your Stumbleupon comments would be a nice feature, but they don't appear to be included in the Stumbleupon RSS feed: &lt;a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/syndicate.php?stumbler=andybeard"&gt;http://www.stumbleupon.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Buchheit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:33:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That looks like an interesting service, with lots of flaws as you have pointed out. I came across FriendFeed in my usual rounds around the blogging world, and thought it was something to come back to. I don't like the fact that they don't search through websites often enough, you mentioned "clumps of posts" and such. Thanks for the update, it is good to hear what others are saying before you dive right in ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:56:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That looks like an interesting service, with lots of flaws as you have pointed out. I came across FriendFeed in my usual rounds around the blogging world, and thought it was something to come back to. I don't like the fact that they don't search through websites often enough, you mentioned "clumps of posts" and such. Thanks for the update, it is good to hear what others are saying before you dive right in ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:56:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting Andy. So can I get a &lt;a href="http://fla.vo.it" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fla.vo.it"&gt;fla.vo.it&lt;/a&gt; beta invite from you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Martin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Espericueta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:36:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting Andy. So can I get a &lt;a href="http://fla.vo.it" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fla.vo.it"&gt;fla.vo.it&lt;/a&gt; beta invite from you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Martin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Espericueta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:36:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-10993741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me a lot of these new, twatty sites are just the same ingredients but mixed in a different way. The problem for me is if the people in my industry start using them, then I have to as well to know what they are talking about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may as well get a copy of Carp and build your own system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lyndon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Flaws &amp;#8211; The Wrong Kind Of Attention Grabbing</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1285/friendfeed-flaws-the-wrong-kind-of-attention-grabbing.html#comment-12528112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me a lot of these new, twatty sites are just the same ingredients but mixed in a different way. The problem for me is if the people in my industry start using them, then I have to as well to know what they are talking about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may as well get a copy of Carp and build your own system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lyndon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>