-
Website
http://andybeard.eu/ -
Original page
http://andybeard.eu/1054/pagerank-update.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
authorityseo
4 comments · 16 points
-
Jonathan Dingman
4 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
2656 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
4 comments · 1 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
http://www.dynamicdrive.com/
www.bontb.com
http://www.dynamicdrive.com/
www.bontb.com
I don't sell pagerank, yet my site was hit.
These blog networks are interlinking, but then so is Yahoo, and so does Google.
But I don't really mind. The thing is that you shouldn't mind too. If you get less reader because of that it's not because Google is penalizing you; the reason is that someone else is using Google PR to create artificial classification.
PR shouldn't be used to build ranking tables.Even google doesn't use that (especially the one we see on the bar).
The big problem with this is that Google itself use PageRank to create a ranking table based upon DMOZ
http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Inter...
That is also what Google state of the intention of toolbar pagerank within their pages for the toolbar.
Here are Googles own words
Google are telling lies
As long as Toolbar PR is the only public measure we have from Google, it's going to continue to matter. By drastically dropping the PR of these high profile sites, Google is just asking to be hated.
I don't sell pagerank, yet my site was hit.
These blog networks are interlinking, but then so is Yahoo, and so does Google.
But I don't really mind. The thing is that you shouldn't mind too. If you get less reader because of that it's not because Google is penalizing you; the reason is that someone else is using Google PR to create artificial classification.
PR shouldn't be used to build ranking tables.Even google doesn't use that (especially the one we see on the bar).
The big problem with this is that Google itself use PageRank to create a ranking table based upon DMOZ
http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Inter...
That is also what Google state of the intention of toolbar pagerank within their pages for the toolbar.
Here are Googles own words
Google are telling lies
As long as Toolbar PR is the only public measure we have from Google, it's going to continue to matter. By drastically dropping the PR of these high profile sites, Google is just asking to be hated.
There just isn't anything different that I can do now, other than shutting down all revenue all together. Looking at your list, all the players got hit so PageRank just isn't valid anymore in this niche.
Now I dropped again and sit at PR1. That's the -2. Google hasn't updated global toolbar rank yet. If they did, mine would have to be higher.
There just isn't anything different that I can do now, other than shutting down all revenue all together. Looking at your list, all the players got hit so PageRank just isn't valid anymore in this niche.
Now I dropped again and sit at PR1. That's the -2. Google hasn't updated global toolbar rank yet. If they did, mine would have to be higher.
I am tired of dancing to Google's music and being penalized even when I do!
I am tired of dancing to Google's music and being penalized even when I do!
SunTimes.com (7 -> 5)
TheGadgetBlog.com (5 -> 3)
Space.com (7 -> 5)
NewScientist.com (7 -> 5, although I don't know for how long that 302 has been there...)
Now I'm going to yell at my hosting, followed by (hopefully) actually getting some work done ;)
After Google's October Surprise, don't you mean NOfollowed by getting some work done?
SunTimes.com (7 -> 5)
TheGadgetBlog.com (5 -> 3)
Space.com (7 -> 5)
NewScientist.com (7 -> 5, although I don't know for how long that 302 has been there...)
Now I'm going to yell at my hosting, followed by (hopefully) actually getting some work done ;)
After Google's October Surprise, don't you mean NOfollowed by getting some work done?
Also my Digital Photography School blog is from 6 to 4 and it doesnt sell links or link to any other blogs in a network - although it is on a blogroll at b5 - so if it's a network think it's not just that you link to others - but it'd be a penalty for being linked TO too much which is a bit of a worry (it'd mean you could feasibly take a competitor down by linking to them too much)
If it is a network interlinking thing then I think Google have just set themselves up for a massive amount of work. What blogger with more than one blog doesn't interlink their blogs?
Q: What is the difference between a blackhat and their linkfarms of thousands of sites and a blog network?
A: A blog network is less subtle about the interlinking and leaves a bigger footprint
I did check Gawker and Techcrunch, but they also have far fewer blogs involved.
Not all Weblogs Inc properties have been affected either, just the most prominent.
If they have the ability to penalize for them - why can't they just take any value away from them?
Because they can't. It's probably not how their algorithm was set up. Remember it is all about the backrub philosophy, you scratch mine and I scratch yours.
Except now I think it's, We {Google} scratch who we want!
Also my Digital Photography School blog is from 6 to 4 and it doesnt sell links or link to any other blogs in a network - although it is on a blogroll at b5 - so if it's a network think it's not just that you link to others - but it'd be a penalty for being linked TO too much which is a bit of a worry (it'd mean you could feasibly take a competitor down by linking to them too much)
If it is a network interlinking thing then I think Google have just set themselves up for a massive amount of work. What blogger with more than one blog doesn't interlink their blogs?
Q: What is the difference between a blackhat and their linkfarms of thousands of sites and a blog network?
A: A blog network is less subtle about the interlinking and leaves a bigger footprint
I did check Gawker and Techcrunch, but they also have far fewer blogs involved.
Not all Weblogs Inc properties have been affected either, just the most prominent.
If they have the ability to penalize for them - why can't they just take any value away from them?
Because they can't. It's probably not how their algorithm was set up. Remember it is all about the backrub philosophy, you scratch mine and I scratch yours.
Except now I think it's, We {Google} scratch who we want!
I don't see Matt Cutts visiting OwnedByPugs.com and UrbanPug.com (yes, these went back in PR too) to check their paid links. He's not a dog person but a cat lover...
I don't see Matt Cutts visiting OwnedByPugs.com and UrbanPug.com (yes, these went back in PR too) to check their paid links. He's not a dog person but a cat lover...
I guess my question is has any one increased PR? It seems like everyone is just being lowered in adjustment. I really did not keep track of PageRank too much so I can't tell.
I guess my question is has any one increased PR? It seems like everyone is just being lowered in adjustment. I really did not keep track of PageRank too much so I can't tell.
Screw 'em.
Google can come up with new rules to protect their advertising models as much as they like ('cos that's all this is) but if people ignore them en masse..... Courage people, they can only do as much damage as you let them.
As for Problogger getting spanked,I wouldn't be surprised if it was linked to all the recent outgoing links connected to the various writing projects & competitions - how on Earth could Darren check if they were to 'bad neighbourhoods' or not? Indeed, if the majority of those blogs he linked to are monetized in anyway to do with TLA or PPP they could be classed as such by Google.
So, Darren is generous to his readers, and gets stiffed in reply.
Yay. Go Google......
But why i cannot vote in your poll ?
Screw 'em.
Google can come up with new rules to protect their advertising models as much as they like ('cos that's all this is) but if people ignore them en masse..... Courage people, they can only do as much damage as you let them.
As for Problogger getting spanked,I wouldn't be surprised if it was linked to all the recent outgoing links connected to the various writing projects & competitions - how on Earth could Darren check if they were to 'bad neighbourhoods' or not? Indeed, if the majority of those blogs he linked to are monetized in anyway to do with TLA or PPP they could be classed as such by Google.
So, Darren is generous to his readers, and gets stiffed in reply.
Yay. Go Google......
But why i cannot vote in your poll ?
btw. http://www.adesblog.com/ is now PR5 from PR7
btw. http://www.adesblog.com/ is now PR5 from PR7
Thankfully all of our main site sections are still sitting at PR 5, but who knows where the slide will end!
Thankfully all of our main site sections are still sitting at PR 5, but who knows where the slide will end!
Any one please help me about this issue. If you know any thing please reply to nithin_chinni2002@yahoo.com
Also suggestions are welcomed.
Any one please help me about this issue. If you know any thing please reply to nithin_chinni2002@yahoo.com
Also suggestions are welcomed.
virtually ZERO inbound links, no content, no nothing, stay at PR 5 and PR 6... chances are they just haven't gotten to these sites yet.
Of course, I'm pissed that my PR has dropped on my two main sites, but there's not much to do about it. I'm not going to nofollow my links because I just don't believe in this approach and I'm not going to stop selling advertising because, well, I like to have a few extra bucks every month.
I think we need to all wait and let this play out a bit more... their PR algorithm wasn't all that great to begin with. It was very inaccurate and sometimes just strange, and what they’re doing now is just making it even more inaccurate and even stranger. Eventually more and more people will begin to notice that it’s inaccurate and strange and will stop trusting it.
I wish the googlites could just let us know what is going on. It’s their PR and they can change it all they want, but it would be nice if they could work on their communication skills and stop being such snobs.
virtually ZERO inbound links, no content, no nothing, stay at PR 5 and PR 6... chances are they just haven't gotten to these sites yet.
Of course, I'm pissed that my PR has dropped on my two main sites, but there's not much to do about it. I'm not going to nofollow my links because I just don't believe in this approach and I'm not going to stop selling advertising because, well, I like to have a few extra bucks every month.
I think we need to all wait and let this play out a bit more... their PR algorithm wasn't all that great to begin with. It was very inaccurate and sometimes just strange, and what they’re doing now is just making it even more inaccurate and even stranger. Eventually more and more people will begin to notice that it’s inaccurate and strange and will stop trusting it.
I wish the googlites could just let us know what is going on. It’s their PR and they can change it all they want, but it would be nice if they could work on their communication skills and stop being such snobs.
An ebbing tide lowers all boats.
An ebbing tide lowers all boats.
my geeks blog http://www.geekissimo.com from 5 to 3.....
my geeks blog http://www.geekissimo.com from 5 to 3.....
google is becoming another 'microsoft' ... ppl is starting to hate them
i've since forget abt PR and focused on content these days
google is becoming another 'microsoft' ... ppl is starting to hate them
i've since forget abt PR and focused on content these days
I can't believe this. It would be so much simpler if Google just came out and said they changed the algorithm or something. I mean come on, this is ridiculous.
I can't believe this. It would be so much simpler if Google just came out and said they changed the algorithm or something. I mean come on, this is ridiculous.
As some of you have well understood Google has just limited the amount of PageRank these sites can pass on to other sites, whether these others are paying or not.
I have lost 3 points of PR but I see not even a slight change in traffic nor in revenue from AdSense. Maybe I should wait before arriving at such conclusions but what I see is:
Google is not penalizing sites by lowering their search position inside SERPS. It is only lowering their PR so that they can pass on less juice if they ever wanted to.
Cutting down interlinking inside small and large blog networks is something we need to add to the new list of items that make Google sneeze, while stopping being so paranoid about our position inside the charts.
It makes a difference to me as a blogger and as a businessman looking to capitalize on my growing authority to be hit with a penalty.
You struggled to make a living when you had a Google penalty, and I actually had a lot of sympathy and submitted your problems to Sphinn.
My monetization and living doesn't rely on Google traffic or income, but that green bar sometimes has more relevance than all the Google traffic I get sent.
It is a form of social proof, and it is seen that way by the general public who will have no idea why my site is a PR3, and a splog with scraped content is rated higher.
Especially when they see that you have nofollow removed.
You won't get many visitors really interested in your knowledge coming to your site through ranking charts.
However many people following the lists have been "converted" and many have given me far more juice than I have ever given them.
That is a community thing that many online marketers and SEOs just don't understand.
Dofollow links is really just a token gesture on a well optimized blog.
I am also on many charts and you can imagine that the same drop you have gotten as a consequence of yesterday PR drop has also hit my own visibility and traffic from those sources too.
I understand you saying that your sustainability does not depend on Google's traffic but openly complaining about the negative impact resulting from the loss of PR.
Is this because you do consulting work and people look at your PageRank before considering to hire you, or simply because the lesser exposure on those charts takes away more customers from your potential pool of clients?
This blog has always been intended to challenge SEO concepts on certain issues, including Google's stance on paid links and PageRank / Juice control in various ways.
On the monetization front it just damages options. I have never, and have no intention of selling links intended to game search results, but I do walk close to the line with the few "consulting reviews" I write.
Many experts state that visible PageRank drop has no effect on traffic. The charts are just an example of a real effect on traffic, and also justify the way PageRank is used by many as an indication of a site's relevance for advertisers, not just to sell PageRank influencing links. Google use it as a ranking method themselves in their directory, provide APIs to get the data, then expect no one to use it?
As some of you have well understood Google has just limited the amount of PageRank these sites can pass on to other sites, whether these others are paying or not.
I have lost 3 points of PR but I see not even a slight change in traffic nor in revenue from AdSense. Maybe I should wait before arriving at such conclusions but what I see is:
Google is not penalizing sites by lowering their search position inside SERPS. It is only lowering their PR so that they can pass on less juice if they ever wanted to.
Cutting down interlinking inside small and large blog networks is something we need to add to the new list of items that make Google sneeze, while stopping being so paranoid about our position inside the charts.
It makes a difference to me as a blogger and as a businessman looking to capitalize on my growing authority to be hit with a penalty.
You struggled to make a living when you had a Google penalty, and I actually had a lot of sympathy and submitted your problems to Sphinn.
My monetization and living doesn't rely on Google traffic or income, but that green bar sometimes has more relevance than all the Google traffic I get sent.
It is a form of social proof, and it is seen that way by the general public who will have no idea why my site is a PR3, and a splog with scraped content is rated higher.
Especially when they see that you have nofollow removed.
You won't get many visitors really interested in your knowledge coming to your site through ranking charts.
However many people following the lists have been "converted" and many have given me far more juice than I have ever given them.
That is a community thing that many online marketers and SEOs just don't understand.
Dofollow links is really just a token gesture on a well optimized blog.
I am also on many charts and you can imagine that the same drop you have gotten as a consequence of yesterday PR drop has also hit my own visibility and traffic from those sources too.
I understand you saying that your sustainability does not depend on Google's traffic but openly complaining about the negative impact resulting from the loss of PR.
Is this because you do consulting work and people look at your PageRank before considering to hire you, or simply because the lesser exposure on those charts takes away more customers from your potential pool of clients?
This blog has always been intended to challenge SEO concepts on certain issues, including Google's stance on paid links and PageRank / Juice control in various ways.
On the monetization front it just damages options. I have never, and have no intention of selling links intended to game search results, but I do walk close to the line with the few "consulting reviews" I write.
Many experts state that visible PageRank drop has no effect on traffic. The charts are just an example of a real effect on traffic, and also justify the way PageRank is used by many as an indication of a site's relevance for advertisers, not just to sell PageRank influencing links. Google use it as a ranking method themselves in their directory, provide APIs to get the data, then expect no one to use it?
Statcounter had a PR of 10. But it has just been cut off as well.
Statcounter had a PR of 10. But it has just been cut off as well.
AOL is a fairly big Google partner, and they have just been told by Google that their blogs are a load of webspam, yet another competitor such as Yahoo didn't get a penalty for mass interlinking, and openly sells links in their directory.
If I was AOL right now, I would be seriously considering doing something similar to what Ebay did a few months back.
AOL is a fairly big Google partner, and they have just been told by Google that their blogs are a load of webspam, yet another competitor such as Yahoo didn't get a penalty for mass interlinking, and openly sells links in their directory.
If I was AOL right now, I would be seriously considering doing something similar to what Ebay did a few months back.
it's great how things are changing for people who only look at PR's... there is alot more to a blog / website then just it's PR...
it's great how things are changing for people who only look at PR's... there is alot more to a blog / website then just it's PR...
hat is especially the case once the data is transferred over to Google's own version (which uses PageRank to rate the sites)
This site constantly gains links, high quality links from authority sites, so a drop in relative pagerank would be unlikely.
My link profile is too wide, as are all of the other sites listed.
Even in Vlad's case, whilst I have probably given him a fair amount of juice over the last 12 months, a PR2 is a joke, and so is that of Court.
hat is especially the case once the data is transferred over to Google's own version (which uses PageRank to rate the sites)
This site constantly gains links, high quality links from authority sites, so a drop in relative pagerank would be unlikely.
My link profile is too wide, as are all of the other sites listed.
Even in Vlad's case, whilst I have probably given him a fair amount of juice over the last 12 months, a PR2 is a joke, and so is that of Court.
It's just kind of disheartening that a primary source of revenue will be stripped away by Google. What happens when these mom-and-pop sites can't pay for hosting because they aren't getting paid advertisers?
It's just kind of disheartening that a primary source of revenue will be stripped away by Google. What happens when these mom-and-pop sites can't pay for hosting because they aren't getting paid advertisers?
They obviouusly couldn't give a flying about what we think, else why be so contemptuous about it all? *shrugs*
They obviouusly couldn't give a flying about what we think, else why be so contemptuous about it all? *shrugs*
Perhaps in hindsight, Analytics seems to act much more like a Trojan Horse than a "free service for the community".
We let them in, we gave them all the info they needed, and now, they are using it against us.
I start looking for a new analytics solution today. I'll pay for it if I have to. I'm done giving the devil access to my personal diary. ;)
Between that and the Google Toolbar, they have access to a ton of information regarding the flow of traffic across the web.
I use Awstats... which sucks... but at least I get to keep my underwear on... ;-)
Perhaps in hindsight, Analytics seems to act much more like a Trojan Horse than a "free service for the community".
We let them in, we gave them all the info they needed, and now, they are using it against us.
I start looking for a new analytics solution today. I'll pay for it if I have to. I'm done giving the devil access to my personal diary. ;)
Between that and the Google Toolbar, they have access to a ton of information regarding the flow of traffic across the web.
I use Awstats... which sucks... but at least I get to keep my underwear on... ;-)
There are no links being sold on the site without the mandatory [code]rel="nofollow[/code]" that Google loves, so I have no explanation for it.
John
There are no links being sold on the site without the mandatory [code]rel="nofollow[/code]" that Google loves, so I have no explanation for it.
John
http://www.iwebtool.com/pagerank_checker
http://www.iwebtool.com/pagerank_checker
http://www.smartpagerank.com/
http://www.iwebtool.com/pagerank_checker
and
http://ppp.customtools.urltrends.com/index.php
All claim to sample instantly!
http://www.smartpagerank.com/
http://www.iwebtool.com/pagerank_checker
and
http://ppp.customtools.urltrends.com/index.php
All claim to sample instantly!
PR4 is the new PR6
PR3 is the new PR5
Google finally goes after the digerati and they are shocked, just shocked! I think it might be time to get some money out of the piggy bank for your new Adwords campaigns. Could this just be a terrible Google revenue enhancement accident??? Join the club.
From what I have been able to determine, all nofollow links have been followed by a bot from Google for at least the last 9 months or so. They just don't count them, but they do see where they go.
Nothing happened to my site's PR, but then I don't use blog network linking tactics to excess. You need links from all types of sources, not just other blogs. If only the digerati are reading and linking to the other digerati, how truly relevant is that? Besides, given their demographics, digerati may have high Adwords revenue potential. Squeeze that turnip.
Greenie
PR4 is the new PR6
PR3 is the new PR5
Google finally goes after the digerati and they are shocked, just shocked! I think it might be time to get some money out of the piggy bank for your new Adwords campaigns. Could this just be a terrible Google revenue enhancement accident??? Join the club.
From what I have been able to determine, all nofollow links have been followed by a bot from Google for at least the last 9 months or so. They just don't count them, but they do see where they go.
Nothing happened to my site's PR, but then I don't use blog network linking tactics to excess. You need links from all types of sources, not just other blogs. If only the digerati are reading and linking to the other digerati, how truly relevant is that? Besides, given their demographics, digerati may have high Adwords revenue potential. Squeeze that turnip.
Greenie
Stats:
Sat 10/20: 243,546
Sun 10/21: 264,249
Mon 10/22: 407,464
Tue 10/23: 699,705
Wed 10/24: 756,951
we will see
Stats:
Sat 10/20: 243,546
Sun 10/21: 264,249
Mon 10/22: 407,464
Tue 10/23: 699,705
Wed 10/24: 756,951
we will see
I have no idea, I'm a PR0 all the way :)
I have no idea, I'm a PR0 all the way :)
re your comment at the end of the post, it would appear to have only kicked in at a certain number, so only larger linking networks have been punished as opposed to some of the real small ones, least from what I can see.
I am fairly sure my editorial has far more value on the web than Yahoo paid directory links.
Thus they have missed a few, and Techcrunch pushes the envelope a little too with the post thanking advertisers, and mentioning advertisers without nofollow links.
TLA was probably mentioned on Techcrunch as many, maybe more times than PPP.
Know More Media have more cross linking than B5 media
Splashcast were partially hit
Copyblogger has never had paid links, but has potentially followable advertising links even though they are through an ad server, but then Clickbank passes PR as well, as do a number of affiliate programs.
Whilst they may well have received some kind of visual warning about the linking practice, that doesn't mean Techcrunch is innocent.
Thus only a subset have been punished so far for possible interlinking, just like only a subset of link sellers or advertising sellers.
Did you see how Valleyway were so happy pointing the finger?
Did you also notice their Intel sponsorship without nofollow?
re your comment at the end of the post, it would appear to have only kicked in at a certain number, so only larger linking networks have been punished as opposed to some of the real small ones, least from what I can see.
I am fairly sure my editorial has far more value on the web than Yahoo paid directory links.
Thus they have missed a few, and Techcrunch pushes the envelope a little too with the post thanking advertisers, and mentioning advertisers without nofollow links.
TLA was probably mentioned on Techcrunch as many, maybe more times than PPP.
Know More Media have more cross linking than B5 media
Splashcast were partially hit
Copyblogger has never had paid links, but has potentially followable advertising links even though they are through an ad server, but then Clickbank passes PR as well, as do a number of affiliate programs.
Whilst they may well have received some kind of visual warning about the linking practice, that doesn't mean Techcrunch is innocent.
Thus only a subset have been punished so far for possible interlinking, just like only a subset of link sellers or advertising sellers.
Did you see how Valleyway were so happy pointing the finger?
Did you also notice their Intel sponsorship without nofollow?
If we take this big big group, it explains all the sites that are loosing (we hope not forever) pagerank.
If we take this big big group, it explains all the sites that are loosing (we hope not forever) pagerank.
Go Google at last we are seeing the right way from Google, we have been warning people for a long time of the dangers of online marketers that really dont know what real marketing is all about. Paid links bad advice and money blogging. all they have all been doing is leading people up a garden path.
We for one celebrate the dismiss of the so called Guru - I.e made money from a virgin market.
Good on you Google - The big ship is turning at last.
Have a B L O G G I N G good day.
Go Google at last we are seeing the right way from Google, we have been warning people for a long time of the dangers of online marketers that really dont know what real marketing is all about. Paid links bad advice and money blogging. all they have all been doing is leading people up a garden path.
We for one celebrate the dismiss of the so called Guru - I.e made money from a virgin market.
Good on you Google - The big ship is turning at last.
Have a B L O G G I N G good day.
I was making some great pocket money based on that PR5 too, so Google just screwed me out of my beer money.
AS soon as I get my Absence money from them I think I'll cut all ties wit them, hopefully others will follow.
I was making some great pocket money based on that PR5 too, so Google just screwed me out of my beer money.
AS soon as I get my Absence money from them I think I'll cut all ties wit them, hopefully others will follow.
http://www.error500.net
Pagerank 6 -> Pagerank 3
http://www.error500.net
Pagerank 6 -> Pagerank 3
ps
no one comment after me!
ps
no one comment after me!
I don't think this is good for Google also. Companies like TLA and others have just started and I don't think Google can stop this expansion. They will just exclude page rank as relevant attribute of blog/website value.
I don't think this is good for Google also. Companies like TLA and others have just started and I don't think Google can stop this expansion. They will just exclude page rank as relevant attribute of blog/website value.
Google AdWords -> AdSense -> Ad(d)PageRank
That won't be cheap, I guess.
Just my humble 2 cents. --John
Google AdWords -> AdSense -> Ad(d)PageRank
That won't be cheap, I guess.
Just my humble 2 cents. --John
My photography blog dropped from a 4 to an N/A. Can't sell any ads with that, but I was only making nickels and dimes from that site, anyways.
Yet my traffic has never been higher, and I have had a simultaneous upsurge in hits over the past two weeks. My site was averaging about 400 uniques a day, but has averaged nearly 1000 uniques since early October.
Of course, Alexa fails to recognize that two-and-a-half fold traffic rise, but that's another story altogether.
Agreed that the corporate mentalité of Google is one of arrogance, hypocrisy, and greed. These will be the corporate downfall, and I agree with earlier posters that there will be blowback that Google's wonks did not forsee.
My photography blog dropped from a 4 to an N/A. Can't sell any ads with that, but I was only making nickels and dimes from that site, anyways.
Yet my traffic has never been higher, and I have had a simultaneous upsurge in hits over the past two weeks. My site was averaging about 400 uniques a day, but has averaged nearly 1000 uniques since early October.
Of course, Alexa fails to recognize that two-and-a-half fold traffic rise, but that's another story altogether.
Agreed that the corporate mentalité of Google is one of arrogance, hypocrisy, and greed. These will be the corporate downfall, and I agree with earlier posters that there will be blowback that Google's wonks did not forsee.
I maintain this is a simple result of marking link seller's pages as "don't pass page rank."
Its not necessary for Google to "Identify interlinking," the page rank algorithm already does that. The thing that is new is Google's database of link sellers. Marking pages "don't pass" interrupts the flow of page rank across any such network.
Some good folks at the periphery of the link selling network will lose PR because many of their incoming links are devalued. An ebbing tide lowers all boats.
I maintain this is a simple result of marking link seller's pages as "don't pass page rank."
Its not necessary for Google to "Identify interlinking," the page rank algorithm already does that. The thing that is new is Google's database of link sellers. Marking pages "don't pass" interrupts the flow of page rank across any such network.
Some good folks at the periphery of the link selling network will lose PR because many of their incoming links are devalued. An ebbing tide lowers all boats.
www.plagiarismtoday.com - PR5 to PR3
Now PR3 on most datacenters and PR5 on few.
www.plagiarismtoday.com - PR5 to PR3
Now PR3 on most datacenters and PR5 on few.
I think it mistook my long blogroll as spam, I removed and I'm going to reintroduce a new one soon.
I think it mistook my long blogroll as spam, I removed and I'm going to reintroduce a new one soon.
Interestingly, I sort of knew something like this was coming since my AdSense revenues have been down almost 50% over the last month. Fortunately it is not my sole source of income.
Interestingly, I sort of knew something like this was coming since my AdSense revenues have been down almost 50% over the last month. Fortunately it is not my sole source of income.
I've seen no measurable drop in SERPS nor have I see an drop off in search engine traffic. Perhaps, for my site at least, PR is just an age.
I've seen no measurable drop in SERPS nor have I see an drop off in search engine traffic. Perhaps, for my site at least, PR is just an age.
What to do, what to do? Probably nothing.
Len
What to do, what to do? Probably nothing.
Len
As my father has said many times, if you don't ask you don't get. I have a few PR7 sites that are just link exchanging with me due to actually asking.
No need to pay for links
As my father has said many times, if you don't ask you don't get. I have a few PR7 sites that are just link exchanging with me due to actually asking.
No need to pay for links
The process is not completely done, not being exported to the toolbar equally for all sites, or not an actual algorithmic change.
The process is not completely done, not being exported to the toolbar equally for all sites, or not an actual algorithmic change.
Might be worht checking this out: www.joostdevalk.nl/i-requested-reconsideration-...
Might be worht checking this out: www.joostdevalk.nl/i-requested-reconsideration-...
Cheers :)
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-ca...
I hope you don't offer SEO services as well.
Cheers :)
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-ca...
I hope you don't offer SEO services as well.
http://www.sigmainfotech.com.au/
Cheers :)
http://www.sigmainfotech.com.au/
Cheers :)
Thanks a lot, Goog.
Thanks a lot, Goog.
We're starting to take a look at the different Data Centers and see which way Google is leaning. We'll track the different numbers there to see if Google is going to roll this back a little or not. AS it stands either not all the data centers are updated or some of them are already rolling back as the numbers aren't consistent.
We'll have to see.
We're starting to take a look at the different Data Centers and see which way Google is leaning. We'll track the different numbers there to see if Google is going to roll this back a little or not. AS it stands either not all the data centers are updated or some of them are already rolling back as the numbers aren't consistent.
We'll have to see.
We took a look at the article directories -- all of them lost 1 to 3 notches. No big surprise there tho.
Also pretty funny how all of us claim not to really care about PR, but this one post has 116 comments.
We took a look at the article directories -- all of them lost 1 to 3 notches. No big surprise there tho.
Also pretty funny how all of us claim not to really care about PR, but this one post has 116 comments.
This Google update is disgraceful.
This Google update is disgraceful.
I too found it hard to believe this was all automated but seeing some pretty small blogs effected coupled with a distant memory of Matt Cutts asking people to report link selling sites to test an algorithm leaves me wondering about at least a semi-automated method.
I too found it hard to believe this was all automated but seeing some pretty small blogs effected coupled with a distant memory of Matt Cutts asking people to report link selling sites to test an algorithm leaves me wondering about at least a semi-automated method.
Google... still beta...
Google... still beta...
Still, the quoted Kerner-"theory" above has one week point from my point of view,
because AdSense has nothing to do with PR inheritance while
selling/buying links on sites is exactly about that.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Still, the quoted Kerner-"theory" above has one week point from my point of view,
because AdSense has nothing to do with PR inheritance while
selling/buying links on sites is exactly about that.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
ModulusSystems.com has lost PR.. only because I added about 20 nofollow links.. there you go!
ModulusSystems.com has lost PR.. only because I added about 20 nofollow links.. there you go!
ModulusSystems.com has lost PR.. only because I added about 20 nofollow links.. there you go!
ModulusSystems.com has lost PR.. only because I added about 20 nofollow links.. there you go!
http://www.articledashboard.com went from 5 to 6, and they mainly have sitewide links on a lot of other article directories with thousands of pages.
I would say that it is definately too close to tell to know what is going on yet.
http://www.articledashboard.com went from 5 to 6, and they mainly have sitewide links on a lot of other article directories with thousands of pages.
I would say that it is definately too close to tell to know what is going on yet.
Madness, but as the scale is only 0-10 its a bit small to accommodate the vastness of the internet.
Madness, but as the scale is only 0-10 its a bit small to accommodate the vastness of the internet.
Happy Optimizing, & Never Give Up On Your Dreams!
Happy Optimizing, & Never Give Up On Your Dreams!
i zligged this post since it talks about making money online... if you've got other "make money online" posts - come zligg them,
and see them rise in rank. http://www.zligg.com
i zligged this post since it talks about making money online... if you've got other "make money online" posts - come zligg them,
and see them rise in rank. http://www.zligg.com
I'm planning to sell links on my site too.
I'm planning to sell links on my site too.
Also there seems to be very few reports of sites actually losing traffic - PR doesn't really appear to mean very much anymore.
Also there seems to be very few reports of sites actually losing traffic - PR doesn't really appear to mean very much anymore.
But, your link for searchengineguide.com is wrong. it went to somewhere wierd and Apple related. SearchEngineGuide is a great newsletter. I hope you weren't knocking them just because they sell ads. And their Page Rank for them is a 6, as of 11/21/07.
But, your link for searchengineguide.com is wrong. it went to somewhere wierd and Apple related. SearchEngineGuide is a great newsletter. I hope you weren't knocking them just because they sell ads. And their Page Rank for them is a 6, as of 11/21/07.
This Google PR fiasco may not be quite over yet. Though my blog went from PR 0 before the update to PR 3 afterward (and has so far remained there), I know someone who had a pre-update PR of 3, which went up to 4 right after the update, then down to 2 about a week later, and which has now, as of the beginning of this week, dropped to PR 0. There seems to be little rhyme or reason to Google's heavy-handed penalties, and their fickleness really is quite perplexing.
One of your earlier commenters stated that PR 3 is the new PR 5, which really has me wondering; because, prior to the recent Google update, the iWebtool page rank prediction tool predicted that my Writer's Notes blog would be a PR 5 after the update, based on the number of backlinks to it, and it came in at PR 3 instead. Hmmmmm...interesting coincidence!
So far, I haven't lost any of the PR ground gained during this update; but I'm still wondering what might yet happen. I write sponsored content on my blog for several different paid-to-post services--even more than does my friend mentioned at the beginning of this comment, whose PR has plummeted to 0. Only time will tell, I guess.
But, I, for one, intend to continue doing things just as I've been doing them up to now. I plan to continue disclosing all sponsored content posted to my blog in fairness to my readers (rather than hiding the fact, as many have advised). The way I look at it, I'll tend to my business and let Google tend to theirs.
Thanks for all this fascinating info!
Jeanne Dininni
This Google PR fiasco may not be quite over yet. Though my blog went from PR 0 before the update to PR 3 afterward (and has so far remained there), I know someone who had a pre-update PR of 3, which went up to 4 right after the update, then down to 2 about a week later, and which has now, as of the beginning of this week, dropped to PR 0. There seems to be little rhyme or reason to Google's heavy-handed penalties, and their fickleness really is quite perplexing.
One of your earlier commenters stated that PR 3 is the new PR 5, which really has me wondering; because, prior to the recent Google update, the iWebtool page rank prediction tool predicted that my Writer's Notes blog would be a PR 5 after the update, based on the number of backlinks to it, and it came in at PR 3 instead. Hmmmmm...interesting coincidence!
So far, I haven't lost any of the PR ground gained during this update; but I'm still wondering what might yet happen. I write sponsored content on my blog for several different paid-to-post services--even more than does my friend mentioned at the beginning of this comment, whose PR has plummeted to 0. Only time will tell, I guess.
But, I, for one, intend to continue doing things just as I've been doing them up to now. I plan to continue disclosing all sponsored content posted to my blog in fairness to my readers (rather than hiding the fact, as many have advised). The way I look at it, I'll tend to my business and let Google tend to theirs.
Thanks for all this fascinating info!
Jeanne Dininni
techtutorials.net - 6 -> 4
certnotes.com - 5 -> 0
certifypro.com - 5 -> 0
beertutor.com - 4 -> 0
7-seconds.com - 2 -> 1
While we do sell some text links, our sites offer great original content. So, I guess I am not going to worry about it too much. If Google continues down this path, they will become irrelevant and they will give somebody else a chance to step in and take over. As a company, they can't be dictators and expect everyone to stay on board with them. At least that is MHO.
techtutorials.net - 6 -> 4
certnotes.com - 5 -> 0
certifypro.com - 5 -> 0
beertutor.com - 4 -> 0
7-seconds.com - 2 -> 1
While we do sell some text links, our sites offer great original content. So, I guess I am not going to worry about it too much. If Google continues down this path, they will become irrelevant and they will give somebody else a chance to step in and take over. As a company, they can't be dictators and expect everyone to stay on board with them. At least that is MHO.
http://bobivibe.com
pr5------------>pr0:(
http://bobivibe.com
pr5------------>pr0:(
i have send some messages to google to reconsider my site, but i have not received any response after 2 months. My traffic decreased 20% and continue decreasing. I have removed this link already from my site.
I think google should try at least to contact with owner before to do this type of action.
Why not decrease rank of payed links from adsense too?
Some years ago, when google was created we love google because, all service that offers was free, and contributed to the original internet spirit to share all, with easy and simple way.
As in the real life google is corrupted and bad directed for the money.
Sorry my bad english i hope you can understand me.
Happy Xmas!
i have send some messages to google to reconsider my site, but i have not received any response after 2 months. My traffic decreased 20% and continue decreasing. I have removed this link already from my site.
I think google should try at least to contact with owner before to do this type of action.
Why not decrease rank of payed links from adsense too?
Some years ago, when google was created we love google because, all service that offers was free, and contributed to the original internet spirit to share all, with easy and simple way.
As in the real life google is corrupted and bad directed for the money.
Sorry my bad english i hope you can understand me.
Happy Xmas!
That may be taken as a problem. Still I am sure Google is still working on this.
Kind regards,
J Mihai
That may be taken as a problem. Still I am sure Google is still working on this.
Kind regards,
J Mihai
thanks
thanks
The honest truth is I noted my PR out of curiousity and not an over-riding need to increase it.
I suppose for internet marketers selling links on their blogs, page rank is important as the cost of the links is tied in to this
For the rest of us who monetize our sites via adsense and affiliate links, i wonder if page rank is so important?
The honest truth is I noted my PR out of curiousity and not an over-riding need to increase it.
I suppose for internet marketers selling links on their blogs, page rank is important as the cost of the links is tied in to this
For the rest of us who monetize our sites via adsense and affiliate links, i wonder if page rank is so important?
One of my sites is PR2, with thousands of relevant PR3/4/5 links and got a PR2 last update, another site with 100-ish links of lower PR got a PR4.
So I dont worry too much, just keep working on SEO and getting good relevant links
One of my sites is PR2, with thousands of relevant PR3/4/5 links and got a PR2 last update, another site with 100-ish links of lower PR got a PR4.
So I dont worry too much, just keep working on SEO and getting good relevant links