<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/blog_search_revisited_8211_google_vs_technorati_vs_techmeme_55/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:09:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Technorati has always been our blog search engine of choice.  Was not as familiar with the Google Blog Search and are now seeing that Technorati may actually be a better choice anyhow.  As Jen said above, it is cool to see that Google really has every avenue covered as far as internet ideas and implementation goes.  Guess you can't expect much less from them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brick Marketing</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Technorati has always been our blog search engine of choice.  Was not as familiar with the Google Blog Search and are now seeing that Technorati may actually be a better choice anyhow.  As Jen said above, it is cool to see that Google really has every avenue covered as far as internet ideas and implementation goes.  Guess you can't expect much less from them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brick Marketing</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting! I never noticed that Google finally has a blog search. Okay, I basically use Google News and Google Scholar but they must have blinded me from Google Blog. I suppose this means that a great and growing number of credible or popular sources are coming from blogs now. Good for Google! They really know how to move forward over there and create new ideas!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jen, writer MembershipMilliona</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting! I never noticed that Google finally has a blog search. Okay, I basically use Google News and Google Scholar but they must have blinded me from Google Blog. I suppose this means that a great and growing number of credible or popular sources are coming from blogs now. Good for Google! They really know how to move forward over there and create new ideas!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jen, writer MembershipMilliona</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Technorati is far more accurate reporting links (aka "reactions") from other blogs. Since WP 2.3 I miss terribly to see Technorati reactions in the Dashboard. Andy, is there a plugin out there to fix it? By "fix it" I mean to show incoming links from Technorati instead of Google Blog Search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527694</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Technorati is far more accurate reporting links (aka "reactions") from other blogs. Since WP 2.3 I miss terribly to see Technorati reactions in the Dashboard. Andy, is there a plugin out there to fix it? By "fix it" I mean to show incoming links from Technorati instead of Google Blog Search.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never knew any of this...I appreciate your posting it has been rather helpful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Navillus99.blogspot.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:55:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never knew any of this...I appreciate your posting it has been rather helpful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Navillus99.blogspot.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:55:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always just used google blog search.  I'm not sure why.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had no idea that technorati was so much "fresher".  Ten in 10 minutes?  That's surprising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I knew that keywords in the titles was supreme.  It's nice to hear confirmation of that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm surprised that rss subscribers doesn't really make a difference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the VERY useful info.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dui</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always just used google blog search.  I'm not sure why.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had no idea that technorati was so much "fresher".  Ten in 10 minutes?  That's surprising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I knew that keywords in the titles was supreme.  It's nice to hear confirmation of that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm surprised that rss subscribers doesn't really make a difference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the VERY useful info.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dui</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to say this, but I don't consider any current blog search engine useful. I may use technorati here and there for the lack of anything better, but the results are still poor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fire Town</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to say this, but I don't consider any current blog search engine useful. I may use technorati here and there for the lack of anything better, but the results are still poor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fire Town</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post and reminds me the importance of title and the other stuffs..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the results about a site comes easily in yahoo these days..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beautiful Minds</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post and reminds me the importance of title and the other stuffs..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the results about a site comes easily in yahoo these days..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beautiful Minds</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Google blog search, time and freshness seems to one qualifying factor..and the results are updated hourly right? Do you see a pattern while re arranging results?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Screenshot 4, for "Microsoft Yahoo" search, the 2nd(&lt;a href="http://Andybeard.eu" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Andybeard.eu"&gt;Andybeard.eu&lt;/a&gt;) and third (&lt;a href="http://scripting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scripting.com"&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt;) result is pushed down, while a new entry is made at the top(NYTimes).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's interesting is there's a site "Mavericksatwork" which was in the third position on screenshot 3,being pushed down, while there's a "new" entry from NY times (result 4 of screenshot 4).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's even more interesting is the first result (&lt;a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com"&gt;http://dealbook.blogs.nytim...&lt;/a&gt;) was indexed 3 hours earlier, while the fourth "duplicate entry" from NYtimes (titled - after rejection Microsoft Yahoo hits a fight) is actually indexed just one hour ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So there are two entries from NY times, the one o the top is indexed 4 hours ago, and theres a new entry after 19 hours (as u suggested) which was indexed one hour ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it confusing. When you say that - when you are selected as relevant, you stay relevant - it doesnt hold true for the new entry (4th position screenshot 4) right? Had he been better in the onsite factors (KW proximity, KW density etc) he could've broken into the first position even.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is your finding on this? (Hope it all makes sense)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mani Karthik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:50:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Google blog search, time and freshness seems to one qualifying factor..and the results are updated hourly right? Do you see a pattern while re arranging results?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Screenshot 4, for "Microsoft Yahoo" search, the 2nd(&lt;a href="http://Andybeard.eu" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Andybeard.eu"&gt;Andybeard.eu&lt;/a&gt;) and third (&lt;a href="http://scripting.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="scripting.com"&gt;scripting.com&lt;/a&gt;) result is pushed down, while a new entry is made at the top(NYTimes).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's interesting is there's a site "Mavericksatwork" which was in the third position on screenshot 3,being pushed down, while there's a "new" entry from NY times (result 4 of screenshot 4).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's even more interesting is the first result (&lt;a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com"&gt;http://dealbook.blogs.nytim...&lt;/a&gt;) was indexed 3 hours earlier, while the fourth "duplicate entry" from NYtimes (titled - after rejection Microsoft Yahoo hits a fight) is actually indexed just one hour ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So there are two entries from NY times, the one o the top is indexed 4 hours ago, and theres a new entry after 19 hours (as u suggested) which was indexed one hour ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it confusing. When you say that - when you are selected as relevant, you stay relevant - it doesnt hold true for the new entry (4th position screenshot 4) right? Had he been better in the onsite factors (KW proximity, KW density etc) he could've broken into the first position even.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is your finding on this? (Hope it all makes sense)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mani Karthik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:50:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Soooo happy to see a ray of sunlight dapple technorati's scenario ... I can't think of another site I'm so partial to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Keep pedalling guys, keep pedalling!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Soooo happy to see a ray of sunlight dapple technorati's scenario ... I can't think of another site I'm so partial to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Keep pedalling guys, keep pedalling!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't got to grips with Earthfrisk yet, though I have given Michael some feedback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't got to grips with Earthfrisk yet, though I have given Michael some feedback.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also use Megite as a meme tracker for other niches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is also Ask / Bloglines though that has also been a little noisy, and you can always take a look at Lijit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:19:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also use Megite as a meme tracker for other niches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is also Ask / Bloglines though that has also been a little noisy, and you can always take a look at Lijit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:19:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ian, just giving kudos where it is deserved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lots of things are still not perfect, I could reel off lots of things that still need to be fixed, or made more consistent, but I am very glad to see that the search results have been cleared up and your indexing speed is good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-10993280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ian, just giving kudos where it is deserved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lots of things are still not perfect, I could reel off lots of things that still need to be fixed, or made more consistent, but I am very glad to see that the search results have been cleared up and your indexing speed is good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBeard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Search Revisited &amp;#8211; Google vs Technorati vs Techmeme</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1210/blog-search-revisited-google-vs-technorati-vs-techmeme.html#comment-12527684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I will be switching as well Andy :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hobo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:21:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>