<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/are_yahoo_guilty_of_unethical_plagiarism_with_syndicated_content_17/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:33:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/594/are-yahoo-guilty-of-unethical-plagiarism-with-syndicated-content.html#comment-10988737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It happens all the time. Someone comes up with great link bait, the idea is stolen and the person stealing it usually ends up with the traffic/links from it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/594/are-yahoo-guilty-of-unethical-plagiarism-with-syndicated-content.html#comment-12523374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It happens all the time. Someone comes up with great link bait, the idea is stolen and the person stealing it usually ends up with the traffic/links from it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/594/are-yahoo-guilty-of-unethical-plagiarism-with-syndicated-content.html#comment-12523373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have seen these scrapers coming.  now, in the real estate industry, you have &lt;a href="http://Overstock.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Overstock.com"&gt;Overstock.com&lt;/a&gt; blatantly stealing listing information.  Trulia cloaking...etc...etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/594/are-yahoo-guilty-of-unethical-plagiarism-with-syndicated-content.html#comment-10988736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have seen these scrapers coming.  now, in the real estate industry, you have &lt;a href="http://Overstock.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Overstock.com"&gt;Overstock.com&lt;/a&gt; blatantly stealing listing information.  Trulia cloaking...etc...etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunter Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/594/are-yahoo-guilty-of-unethical-plagiarism-with-syndicated-content.html#comment-12523372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very disturbing.  Especially so if the original story was on the site of a hard working writer who finally wrote something that should garner a lot of traffic that they did not end up receiving!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Yahoo Guilty of Unethical Plagiarism With Syndicated Content?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/594/are-yahoo-guilty-of-unethical-plagiarism-with-syndicated-content.html#comment-10988735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very disturbing.  Especially so if the original story was on the site of a hard working writer who finally wrote something that should garner a lot of traffic that they did not end up receiving!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>