<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion - Latest Comments in Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description><atom:link href="https://andybeard.disqus.com/answerscom_answerlinks_plugin_8211_how_much_are_those_links_worth_34/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:40:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I personally find it annoying when there is one or two words linked in a paragraph if it not relevant to the author. It detracts from the relevance of the authors writings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Rasmussen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I personally find it annoying when there is one or two words linked in a paragraph if it not relevant to the author. It detracts from the relevance of the authors writings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Rasmussen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Somebody has to be making money on this. It'll come out eventually who it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buy buy buy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Somebody has to be making money on this. It'll come out eventually who it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buy buy buy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy, just wanted to let you know that one of my comments may have been eaten by Akismet. It was rather long, but only contained one link back to WordPress Wank.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would appreciate it if you could fish it out for me. Or, if it's gone forever, let me know and I'll e-mail it to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-KB&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kissing Bandit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy, just wanted to let you know that one of my comments may have been eaten by Akismet. It was rather long, but only contained one link back to WordPress Wank.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would appreciate it if you could fish it out for me. Or, if it's gone forever, let me know and I'll e-mail it to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-KB&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kissing Bandit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Over on WordPress Wank's blog (which lead me here), I mentioned in the comments that &lt;a href="http://WP.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.com"&gt;WP.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; probably signed a non-disclosure agreement. Sure enough, &lt;a href="http://wank.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/tinfoil-hats-they-mess-up-my-hair/#comment-80260" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wank.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/tinfoil-hats-they-mess-up-my-hair/#comment-80260"&gt;Wank updated the comments to reflect it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;…here is a spokesman for &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; saying â€œI really canâ€™t confirm or denyâ€.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for hacking the plugin to add rel="nofollow" links, there's just one problem -- &lt;em&gt;even if you're a blogger big enough to make a splash&lt;/em&gt; -- and it's called user share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://WP.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.com"&gt;WP.com&lt;/a&gt; has a large share of users who will use the plugin and they will undoubtedly &lt;em&gt;use their own version&lt;/em&gt; of the plugin which does not contain the rel="nofollow" attribute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, it will be highly unlikely that Matt/Automattic will allow the plugin into the official &lt;a href="http://WP.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.org"&gt;WP.org&lt;/a&gt; repository.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly, instructions and an option for adding the rel="nofollow" attribute should have been standard, but that wouldn't have been smart marketing, now would it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just something to think about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-KB&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kissing Bandit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Over on WordPress Wank's blog (which lead me here), I mentioned in the comments that &lt;a href="http://WP.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.com"&gt;WP.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; probably signed a non-disclosure agreement. Sure enough, &lt;a href="http://wank.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/tinfoil-hats-they-mess-up-my-hair/#comment-80260" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wank.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/tinfoil-hats-they-mess-up-my-hair/#comment-80260"&gt;Wank updated the comments to reflect it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;…here is a spokesman for &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; saying â€œI really canâ€™t confirm or denyâ€.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for hacking the plugin to add rel="nofollow" links, there's just one problem -- &lt;em&gt;even if you're a blogger big enough to make a splash&lt;/em&gt; -- and it's called user share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://WP.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.com"&gt;WP.com&lt;/a&gt; has a large share of users who will use the plugin and they will undoubtedly &lt;em&gt;use their own version&lt;/em&gt; of the plugin which does not contain the rel="nofollow" attribute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, it will be highly unlikely that Matt/Automattic will allow the plugin into the official &lt;a href="http://WP.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.org"&gt;WP.org&lt;/a&gt; repository.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frankly, instructions and an option for adding the rel="nofollow" attribute should have been standard, but that wouldn't have been smart marketing, now would it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just something to think about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-KB&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kissing Bandit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, especially when you consider &lt;a href="http://Answer.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answer.com"&gt;Answer.com&lt;/a&gt;'s public announcement about how they got penalized in Google just 2 or 3 months ago. I think MC is going to be writing an extra plugin for the search engine to add negative weighting to all those links :) Now, will Wordpress be penalized for selling links??!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SCKD</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:28:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526093</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, especially when you consider &lt;a href="http://Answer.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answer.com"&gt;Answer.com&lt;/a&gt;'s public announcement about how they got penalized in Google just 2 or 3 months ago. I think MC is going to be writing an extra plugin for the search engine to add negative weighting to all those links :) Now, will Wordpress be penalized for selling links??!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SCKD</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:28:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I second that, if no one comes up with a hacked version I might have to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wish they thought of this sooner, because I used to buy text links from &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt;, but it appears they might not be selling them like that anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;what a shame, those text links would be really valuable right now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I always saw them as a site which was loosing ground and real estate, since they did not leverage their percentage of the search results in the past.  It is nice to see them do something right, for a change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And they do not really provide that much added value either.  Mostly just a few extra related links under &amp;amp; info, on top of content they aggregate from other sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That pretty much fits the definition of scraping to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Beharry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I second that, if no one comes up with a hacked version I might have to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wish they thought of this sooner, because I used to buy text links from &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt;, but it appears they might not be selling them like that anymore.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;what a shame, those text links would be really valuable right now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I always saw them as a site which was loosing ground and real estate, since they did not leverage their percentage of the search results in the past.  It is nice to see them do something right, for a change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And they do not really provide that much added value either.  Mostly just a few extra related links under &amp;amp; info, on top of content they aggregate from other sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That pretty much fits the definition of scraping to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Beharry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, I'm waiting for your hacked version of the plugin (it's GPL) with nofollow added to the links. :)  I'd do it, but I'm not high profile enough to make a splash...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Cronin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:19:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy, I'm waiting for your hacked version of the plugin (it's GPL) with nofollow added to the links. :)  I'd do it, but I'm not high profile enough to make a splash...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Cronin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:19:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good spot and good post however I really doubt Wordpress will loose anything near 50% of its value!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gosh. We can tell what you think of Wordpress :) It's a great big link landscape for you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good spot and good post however I really doubt Wordpress will loose anything near 50% of its value!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gosh. We can tell what you think of Wordpress :) It's a great big link landscape for you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First, an aside.  The text link labeled "No nofollow, Dofollo" here in the comment area is broken.  It contains a second 'http://' bit which beaks the link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;If finances aren't disclosed, it calls into question the ethics of a blogging giant â€” don't you think?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Automattic's ethics have been called into question a number of times recently.  They'll just do what they have done in the past and ignore the issue and delete any reference to it on any of the sites that they control.  Matt is known for deleting any comments from the &lt;a href="http://wp.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wp.com"&gt;wp.com&lt;/a&gt; blog, the &lt;a href="http://wp.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wp.com"&gt;wp.com&lt;/a&gt; support forums and his own blog that he doesn't agree with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drmike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:22:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First, an aside.  The text link labeled "No nofollow, Dofollo" here in the comment area is broken.  It contains a second 'http://' bit which beaks the link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;If finances aren't disclosed, it calls into question the ethics of a blogging giant â€” don't you think?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Automattic's ethics have been called into question a number of times recently.  They'll just do what they have done in the past and ignore the issue and delete any reference to it on any of the sites that they control.  Matt is known for deleting any comments from the &lt;a href="http://wp.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wp.com"&gt;wp.com&lt;/a&gt; blog, the &lt;a href="http://wp.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wp.com"&gt;wp.com&lt;/a&gt; support forums and his own blog that he doesn't agree with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drmike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:22:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526088</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Common sense tells me that there must have been some monetary consideration involved.  It will come out eventually.  In the meanwhile, I intend doing what I have always been doing, not being SEO savy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amish Furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Common sense tells me that there must have been some monetary consideration involved.  It will come out eventually.  In the meanwhile, I intend doing what I have always been doing, not being SEO savy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amish Furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, and if they got in there for free a major major coup!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently 'answer tip' enabled my single blog pages&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/answertips" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.answers.com/topic/answertips"&gt;http://www.answers.com/topi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purely to see what it did and how it worked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The idea is that a user double clicks a word and gets a definition . The problem with it of course is that most people dont know it's there and without going mad and splattering the post with their answers brand or putting in big letters FIND THE MEANING OF A WORD DOUBLE CLICK TO SEE IT somewhere prominent the likelihood is that most won't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It does make you wonder why in the context of the deal you mentioned, they just didn't offer this option instead... um, let me see if I can figure out why not..;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robwatts</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, and if they got in there for free a major major coup!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently 'answer tip' enabled my single blog pages&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/answertips" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.answers.com/topic/answertips"&gt;http://www.answers.com/topi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purely to see what it did and how it worked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The idea is that a user double clicks a word and gets a definition . The problem with it of course is that most people dont know it's there and without going mad and splattering the post with their answers brand or putting in big letters FIND THE MEANING OF A WORD DOUBLE CLICK TO SEE IT somewhere prominent the likelihood is that most won't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It does make you wonder why in the context of the deal you mentioned, they just didn't offer this option instead... um, let me see if I can figure out why not..;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robwatts</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy - Has Matt or Automattic commented on the financial aspect of the deal or provided on the exclusivity? If finances aren't disclosed, it calls into question the ethics of a blogging giant -- don't you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Sutherland</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-10991624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy - Has Matt or Automattic commented on the financial aspect of the deal or provided on the exclusivity? If finances aren't disclosed, it calls into question the ethics of a blogging giant -- don't you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Sutherland</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html#comment-12526084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a coup by &lt;a href="http://Answers.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Answers.com"&gt;Answers.com&lt;/a&gt; -- this is going to result in big $$$ in ad impressions from the traffic alone driven by the legions of &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Wordpress.com"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; bloggers, let along the indirect value of the links themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There had to be cash on the table -- I'd have to think that Wikipedia would have been a more natural and less controversial choice here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mblair</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>