-
Website
http://andybeard.eu/ -
Original page
http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Gregg Gordon
6 comments · 1 points
-
Jonathan Dingman
4 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
2656 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
4 comments · 1 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
You know the internet's 'other famous Matt' is completely against links of this type....
You know the internet's 'other famous Matt' is completely against links of this type....
Lol, I happen to know that "other famous Matt" (not the other way though) too - but I would doubt he would have a say here - nobody mentioned about Automattic actually getting paid - I wonder if they will at all disclose it, I'm sure they would have been compensated, they can't be that much off of their rocker!
Lol, I happen to know that "other famous Matt" (not the other way though) too - but I would doubt he would have a say here - nobody mentioned about Automattic actually getting paid - I wonder if they will at all disclose it, I'm sure they would have been compensated, they can't be that much off of their rocker!
On that topic I think we could easily do the same to Google niche by niche and will be blogging about it soon.
On that topic I think we could easily do the same to Google niche by niche and will be blogging about it soon.
It would be a much more effective plugin (I think) if it worked like Kontera ads and just used some javascript to show a pop-up with summary info and a link to read more.
On top of that, what about rewarding blog owners for using the script? Seeems like Answers.com has everything to gain from this.
It would be a much more effective plugin (I think) if it worked like Kontera ads and just used some javascript to show a pop-up with summary info and a link to read more.
On top of that, what about rewarding blog owners for using the script? Seeems like Answers.com has everything to gain from this.
There had to be cash on the table -- I'd have to think that Wikipedia would have been a more natural and less controversial choice here.
There had to be cash on the table -- I'd have to think that Wikipedia would have been a more natural and less controversial choice here.
I recently 'answer tip' enabled my single blog pages
http://www.answers.com/topic/answertips
Purely to see what it did and how it worked.
The idea is that a user double clicks a word and gets a definition . The problem with it of course is that most people dont know it's there and without going mad and splattering the post with their answers brand or putting in big letters FIND THE MEANING OF A WORD DOUBLE CLICK TO SEE IT somewhere prominent the likelihood is that most won't.
It does make you wonder why in the context of the deal you mentioned, they just didn't offer this option instead... um, let me see if I can figure out why not..;)
I recently 'answer tip' enabled my single blog pages
http://www.answers.com/topic/answertips
Purely to see what it did and how it worked.
The idea is that a user double clicks a word and gets a definition . The problem with it of course is that most people dont know it's there and without going mad and splattering the post with their answers brand or putting in big letters FIND THE MEANING OF A WORD DOUBLE CLICK TO SEE IT somewhere prominent the likelihood is that most won't.
It does make you wonder why in the context of the deal you mentioned, they just didn't offer this option instead... um, let me see if I can figure out why not..;)
Automattic's ethics have been called into question a number of times recently. They'll just do what they have done in the past and ignore the issue and delete any reference to it on any of the sites that they control. Matt is known for deleting any comments from the wp.com blog, the wp.com support forums and his own blog that he doesn't agree with.
Automattic's ethics have been called into question a number of times recently. They'll just do what they have done in the past and ignore the issue and delete any reference to it on any of the sites that they control. Matt is known for deleting any comments from the wp.com blog, the wp.com support forums and his own blog that he doesn't agree with.
Gosh. We can tell what you think of Wordpress :) It's a great big link landscape for you :)
Gosh. We can tell what you think of Wordpress :) It's a great big link landscape for you :)
I wish they thought of this sooner, because I used to buy text links from Answers.com, but it appears they might not be selling them like that anymore.
what a shame, those text links would be really valuable right now
Anyway, I always saw them as a site which was loosing ground and real estate, since they did not leverage their percentage of the search results in the past. It is nice to see them do something right, for a change.
And they do not really provide that much added value either. Mostly just a few extra related links under & info, on top of content they aggregate from other sites.
That pretty much fits the definition of scraping to me.
I wish they thought of this sooner, because I used to buy text links from Answers.com, but it appears they might not be selling them like that anymore.
what a shame, those text links would be really valuable right now
Anyway, I always saw them as a site which was loosing ground and real estate, since they did not leverage their percentage of the search results in the past. It is nice to see them do something right, for a change.
And they do not really provide that much added value either. Mostly just a few extra related links under & info, on top of content they aggregate from other sites.
That pretty much fits the definition of scraping to me.
As for hacking the plugin to add rel="nofollow" links, there's just one problem -- even if you're a blogger big enough to make a splash -- and it's called user share.
WP.com has a large share of users who will use the plugin and they will undoubtedly use their own version of the plugin which does not contain the rel="nofollow" attribute.
Also, it will be highly unlikely that Matt/Automattic will allow the plugin into the official WP.org repository.
Frankly, instructions and an option for adding the rel="nofollow" attribute should have been standard, but that wouldn't have been smart marketing, now would it?
Just something to think about.
-KB
As for hacking the plugin to add rel="nofollow" links, there's just one problem -- even if you're a blogger big enough to make a splash -- and it's called user share.
WP.com has a large share of users who will use the plugin and they will undoubtedly use their own version of the plugin which does not contain the rel="nofollow" attribute.
Also, it will be highly unlikely that Matt/Automattic will allow the plugin into the official WP.org repository.
Frankly, instructions and an option for adding the rel="nofollow" attribute should have been standard, but that wouldn't have been smart marketing, now would it?
Just something to think about.
-KB
Would appreciate it if you could fish it out for me. Or, if it's gone forever, let me know and I'll e-mail it to you.
-KB
Would appreciate it if you could fish it out for me. Or, if it's gone forever, let me know and I'll e-mail it to you.
-KB