-
Website
http://andybeard.eu/ -
Original page
http://andybeard.eu/938/29-of-technorati-top-100-never-on-digg-home-page.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
authorityseo
4 comments · 18 points
-
Jonathan Dingman
4 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
2656 comments · 4 points
-
ojbyrne
4 comments · 1 points
-
Vlad Zablotskyy
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Cheers mate,
Glen
Even now my head is buried in htaccess stuff and I should have proofed that post a little better before publishing.
Cheers mate,
Glen
Even now my head is buried in htaccess stuff and I should have proofed that post a little better before publishing.
Yesterday I was doing research for the 30 day challenge and found that one of my key phrases was not popular in the us. The top 10 for that key phrase was Thiland and other smaller countries.
BeachBum
Yesterday I was doing research for the 30 day challenge and found that one of my key phrases was not popular in the us. The top 10 for that key phrase was Thiland and other smaller countries.
BeachBum
I am sure a few of them could benefit from more exposure and would add value with topical news and commentary.
Most of the Top100 do cover material that appears on a regular basis on Digg.
I am sure a few of them could benefit from more exposure and would add value with topical news and commentary.
Most of the Top100 do cover material that appears on a regular basis on Digg.
thank you for useful guide
thank you for useful guide
That means that even if you occasionally write Diggable content, they won't Digg. Digging is easy when you know what the button does and you've already joined. Otherwise, you end up being asked to register. That may not seem a high hurdle, but it's big enough to prevent people from bothering.
Lots of the Technorati Top100 are tech, but many are political, marketing or cool stuff related, with a few GTD and How To sites.
I would really be interested in a list, as on manual inspection I couldn't spot 15 English language blogs on the list which were totally unsuitable for Digg.
That means that even if you occasionally write Diggable content, they won't Digg. Digging is easy when you know what the button does and you've already joined. Otherwise, you end up being asked to register. That may not seem a high hurdle, but it's big enough to prevent people from bothering.
Lots of the Technorati Top100 are tech, but many are political, marketing or cool stuff related, with a few GTD and How To sites.
I would really be interested in a list, as on manual inspection I couldn't spot 15 English language blogs on the list which were totally unsuitable for Digg.
Unfortunately I don't have a full time employee to proof read my content, and sometimes mistakes slip through if you are trying to pump out quality content on an almost daily basis.
Unfortunately I don't have a full time employee to proof read my content, and sometimes mistakes slip through if you are trying to pump out quality content on an almost daily basis.
I have been having a terrible time for the last 2 days as I am using a PC which only has a Polish grammar and spell checker, and I dare not change that otherwise "she that must be obeyed" would get upset.
It is really hard to spell check when every single correctly spelled word is underlined in red.
I have been having a terrible time for the last 2 days as I am using a PC which only has a Polish grammar and spell checker, and I dare not change that otherwise "she that must be obeyed" would get upset.
It is really hard to spell check when every single correctly spelled word is underlined in red.
As far as I'm concerned, occasional errors are to be expected on blogs. Heck, scroll down and read
"[Important Note to Helpful Readers:" here: http://volokh.com/posts/1186776585.shtml
Every single one of the co-bloggers on that blog are university professors. Every single one is recognized to be an excellent writer. The one who wrote the "Important Note" is one of the most highly cited law professors in the US! Plus, every single one of those bloggers occasionally has typos.
If faculty members don't hold themselves to the standard of "don't click publish until it's perfect" why should anyone think that standard is reasonable for other people?
You're writing is excellent. Your information is valuable and would be worth reading even if your writing were less good. Your readers know this. :)
As far as I'm concerned, occasional errors are to be expected on blogs. Heck, scroll down and read
"[Important Note to Helpful Readers:" here: http://volokh.com/posts/1186776585.shtml
Every single one of the co-bloggers on that blog are university professors. Every single one is recognized to be an excellent writer. The one who wrote the "Important Note" is one of the most highly cited law professors in the US! Plus, every single one of those bloggers occasionally has typos.
If faculty members don't hold themselves to the standard of "don't click publish until it's perfect" why should anyone think that standard is reasonable for other people?
You're writing is excellent. Your information is valuable and would be worth reading even if your writing were less good. Your readers know this. :)
Andy is probably fluent in few other languages besides English. Send him to my blog, maybe that will give him a heart attack? :)
Andy is probably fluent in few other languages besides English. Send him to my blog, maybe that will give him a heart attack? :)
Thanks for the info.
Sherman
Thanks for the info.
Sherman
I do not know what sort of license you publish under so I thought it best to inform you.
Thanks for the heads up though.
Once the link attribution kicks in I have no worries ranking for content, and in many ways it helps me.
I do not know what sort of license you publish under so I thought it best to inform you.
Thanks for the heads up though.
Once the link attribution kicks in I have no worries ranking for content, and in many ways it helps me.